PrivateGPT4Linux VS langchain

I found things like this dataset and LocalAI and I followed the article to get PrivateGPT and the GPT4ALL groovy.bin but I'm completely lost and it feels like the more I research the internet or ask BingAI for answers, the more questions I get instead. At this stage I don't know what goes where, if there's a difference between source documents and datasets, should I run this from my 2tb SSD? Should I have the data on my 8tb HDD? Will all this even work on my PC?

No, as the same as the last question, It does not have access to anything except the model data itself. However, there are some approaches that can let LLMs have access LOCAL documents, which means if you can have a program that extracts data from the database into a local folder which contains TEXT files. This could also work for 2(I didn't mention it in 2 because online datas are REALLY big. It would take the model hours to give an answer. If the database is not large then there might be a shot. Check https://github.com/imartinez/privateGPT(Must be GPT4all compatible models sadly).

I've been doing exactly this with an open source repository called PrivateGPT imartinez/privateGPT: Interact privately with your documents using the power of GPT, 100% privately, no data leaks (github.com)

Not really, you will probably need to change the data location and the LLM provider in the example code to get it running. But you don't have to implement that yourself there are a couple projects that already do that like privateGPT. I use it for searching datasheets, got it up an running in a few hours and I'm pretty happy with it so far.

PrivateGPT can do that.

Langchain and the implementation of Custom Tools also is a great (and very efficient) way to setup a dedicated Q&A (for example for chat purpose) agent.

We're using it via langchain talking to Amazon Bedrock which is hosting Claude 1.x. It's comparable to GPT3.x, not bad. The integration doesn't seem to be fully there though, I think langchain is expecting "Human:" and "AI:", but Claude uses "Assistant:".

https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/2638

Depending on how much work you want to put into it, you can get started at HuggingFace with their models and datasets, but you'd need compute power, multiple MLOps, etc. I was introduced to the concept in this video, since Google has their Vertex AI tools on Google Cloud, and there's always LangChain but I'm not sure about anything recent.

a documentation chatbot proof of concept using GPT3.5 and LangChain

I encourage everyone to pay attention to the Langchain open-source project and leverage it to achieve tasks that ChatGPT cannot handle.

Yeah I never know where memory goes exactly in langchain, it's not exactly clear all the time. But sure, the main insight I remember is this, take a look at their MULTI_PROMPT_ROUTER_TEMPLATE: https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/blob/560c4dfc98287da1...

It's a lot of instructions for an LLM, they seem to forget an LLM is an auto-completion machine, and which data it is trained on. Using <<>> for sections is not a normal thing, it's not markdown, which probably the thing read way more often on the internet, instead of open json comments, why not type signatures, instead of so many rules, why not give it examples? It is an autocomplete machine!

They are relying too much on the LLM being smart because they probably only test stuff in GPT-4 and 3.5, but with GPT4All models this prompt was not working at all, so I had to rewrite it, for simple routing, we don't even need json, carying the `next_inputs` here is weird if you don't need it.

So this is my version of it: https://gist.github.com/rogeriochaves/b67676977eebb1936b9b5c...

It's so basic it's dumb, yet it is more powerful, as it does not rely on GPT-4 level intelligence, it's just what I needed