release VS Cubic

The image above represents an error I ran into while building Potabi on Sept-9, 2021. The build is currently supposed to be using the RE Base release b_1.0a-base, the files of which are listed below. For testing purposes, I grabbed the RE Base b_1.0a-base disc1.iso file, as listed in the release. I ran it in QEMU on my personal machine, where the difference in bases between here and on the FreeBSD virtual machine being used for builds should be non-existent. Since I am coming back into development a month after I last did anything, I cannot say with any certainty that this will provide anything useful, but on The Potabi Foundation YouTube Channel, I uploaded a timelapse of this build for fun, not even trying to use it to help debug anything. It shows no issue, as far as I can tell.

I've used Cubic before and really liked it.

Do you have any resource, tip or suggestion to proper debloat it? I'm also try to find out how https://github.com/PJ-Singh-001/Cubic works to make a custom ISO.

> a full OS made on web technologies

I think that's not unlike what ChromeOS is trying to be? With the APIs like WebSerial and WebUSB enabling web apps to do the same things native apps could for years now. (Of course, you can use these in the standalone Chromium, too.)

> an OS with just Firefox would really make everything simpler

It's relatively easy to build a Linux distro that boots straight into Firefox! You can try Cubic, which allows you to create a custom ISO for Debian or Ubuntu with a pretty straightforward GUI wizard. I once used it to create an ISO for an arcade machine.

[1]: https://github.com/PJ-Singh-001/Cubic

Gotcha, Cubic might be what you're looking for then. Found it looking for a similar Fedora alternative a while back.

You'll most likely want something like CubicCubic as it just let's you customise any Debian based distro to your needs to become a live iso with a nice GUI or command line access.