Performance-Analysis-JS VS valtio

Using a for loop will be more efficient because the construct doesn’t invoke a callback. Here’s one example but most jsperf searches will say the same thing.

https://github.com/dg92/Performance-Analysis-JS

The problem with JS is that the execution model is so nebulous, that performance advice basically boils down to - trust in Google.

We took inspiration from the many frameworks we worked with throughout our careers. And maybe surprisingly, Django’s ORM layer impacted our design choices and the API quite a bit. The resulting framework relies on Zod for schemas and validation and Valtio for React integration.

Valtio is like simplified MobX

Even simpler than Zustand are state-atom libraries like jotai or recoil, or proxy based ones like valtio. Here's some discussion about the differences.

There is a package developed around this proxy concept called Valtio which is available for JavaScript, React, and so on... feel free to check and star it on Github.

I'm switching from redux-saga to valtio (https://github.com/pmndrs/valtio) for now. It's simple and easy to use, everything's great so far.

I like valtio, works w/ React or just js. Has subscribe, derive, and more.

https://github.com/pmndrs/valtio

Jotai and Valtio are both also really good. Recently looked at Nanostore as well and has some similarity to Jotai and Recoil.

Since we want the React component to react to an external change, using a state manager makes this easy. We will use Valtio here by example. For this library, change the esbuild config to --target=es2020 instead to remove some warnings (for example, the Zustand library is ok).