Octo Pack VS ijson

Compare Octo Pack vs ijson and see what are their differences.

Octo Pack

Creates Octopus-compatible NuGet packages (by OctopusDeploy)

ijson

Iterative JSON parser with Pythonic interfaces (by ICRAR)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Octo Pack ijson
4 2
182 761
- 4.9%
0.0 7.1
over 3 years ago 25 days ago
C# Python
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Octo Pack

Posts with mentions or reviews of Octo Pack. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-08-22.

ijson

Posts with mentions or reviews of ijson. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-08-22.
  • How do i handle large json file?
    1 project | /r/learnpython | 30 Nov 2021
  • Bringing the Unix Philosophy to the 21st Century
    11 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 Aug 2021
    > JSON’s design assumes the user can read the entire file into memory

    No? The design of most JSON libraries assumes that, but there are perfectly good incremental JSON parsers out there[1–3]. It’s just that people don’t seem to have figured out a good API for not-completely-incremental parsing (please prove me wrong here!), but this applies equally to any structured data format as soon as you want to pull out pieces of data that are nested more than one level down.

    The lack of length prefixes in JSON does indeed make a solid parser somewhat more difficult, but you get the ability to author and validate it manually instead. All in all a draw and not because of the incremental parsing thing.

    (Tabular or otherwise homogeneous data is indeed reprsented wastefully, but unless the individual records are huge json+gzip is a perfectly serviceable “worse-is-better” solution.)

    [1] https://github.com/ICRAR/ijson

    [2] https://github.com/AMDmi3/jsonslicer

    [3] https://github.com/danielyule/naya

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Octo Pack and ijson you can also consider the following projects:

DbUp - DbUp is a .NET library that helps you to deploy changes to SQL Server databases. It tracks which SQL scripts have been run already, and runs the change scripts that are needed to get your database up to date.

jsonslicer - Stream JSON parser for Python

yuniql - Free and open source schema versioning and database migration made natively with .NET/6. NEW THIS MAY 2022! v1.3.15 released!

jc - CLI tool and python library that converts the output of popular command-line tools, file-types, and common strings to JSON, YAML, or Dictionaries. This allows piping of output to tools like jq and simplifying automation scripts.

Unfold - Powershell-based deployment solution for .net web applications

jellex - TUI to filter JSON and JSON Lines data with Python syntax

jello - CLI tool to filter JSON and JSON Lines data with Python syntax. (Similar to jq)

live-awk-mode - Build awk commands interactively with live result sets.

nushell - A new type of shell

Jenkins - Jenkins automation server

murex - A smarter shell and scripting environment with advanced features designed for usability, safety and productivity (eg smarter DevOps tooling)