doom-nvim VS nvim-treesitter-textobjects

theres doom-nvim too btw

Ive been helping rewrite on doom-nvim and this is one of the goals. https://github.com/NTBBloodbath/doom-nvim/tree/next/lua/doom/modules/langs take a look at a more hands language like vue or lua. Might be too much framework for a simple custom config though.

I'm happy with https://github.com/NTBBloodbath/doom-nvim with some extra tuning

I was hoping to use nvim-treesitter-textobjects to jump to the next argument via something like this:

You want to look at nvim-treesitter-textobjects. It let's you define keymaps for navigating text objects defined by treesitter and you can also use them with commands like d, c and so on.

Thank you! It looks like nvim-treesitter-textobjects is a good plugin to start with:

https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter-textobjec...

I'm aware of nvim-treesitter-textobjects and I suspect my answer lies in this plugin, but is there a way to move between root nodes that is agnostic of the node type?

Thanks! I just started using https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter-textobjects, and it works as a charm.

nvim-treesitter-textobjects

In this case, reading here is probably a good start: https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter-textobjects

Have a look at https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter-textobjects. Set up the @block.inner and @block.outer textobjects and it should work.

nvim-treesitter-textobjects lets you jump to (for instance) functions more accurately than with a regex-based approach using ]f

Or even better, one can use nvim-treesitter-textobjects. It already provides function/class selection and go-to functionality out-of-the-box.