MyCrypto VS frame

Hardware wallet? https://mycrypto.com will let you retransmit a new transaction with the same nonce. Did it yesterday during the Binance SEC sell-off frenzy.

Have you tried any deprecated MyEtherWallet versions or perhaps MyCrypto - or any other Ethereum wallets that can have Ledgers connect via hardware wallet? Taho (formerly TallyHo) might be a decent option worth trying as well?

Several years ago the core developers of MyEtherWallet split up their team. One part kept on developing MyEtherWallet and the other part was called MyCrypto, which is maintained up to this day: https://github.com/MyCryptoHQ/MyCrypto

You should be able to manage your XDC using your Ledger as a hardware wallet in conjunction with a 3rd party wallet such as MyCrypto.

this is bad. Yes your wallet is forever compromised. You have to take your funds out ASAP. But read this before: https://blog.mycrypto.com/how-to-beat-an-ethereum-based-sweeper-and-recover-your-assets if ever you have that on your MM wallet. I would suggest you get in contact with the support of https://mycrypto.com/ they're a doing good work. Contact them. Metamask support normally isn't that helpful, but can be a way, too. Normally for compromised wallets they'll send you elsewhere, so you can ask them for direction.

Alternatively, you could connect your Trezor to software like MyCrypto (https://mycrypto.com/). From there, you can broadcast a transaction with the following properties:

mycryptowallet (https://github.com/MyCryptoHQ/MyCrypto)

- MyCrypto: (https://mycrypto.com/)

Regarding your earlier comments on Frame, did you try the AppImage? At least on the x86 side of things, the AppImage just works, and I don't think I've ever seen an AppImage that didn't "just work". The arm64 version can be seen on their releases page here: https://github.com/floating/frame/releases/tag/v0.6.6

Using frame.sh instead of metamask helps. It isn't connected to a single chain at a time, but all of the chains you've added. For example you can use dapps on multiple chains at the same time but never go through the step of switching networks. Also sounds like what you're really complaining about is delay period for fraud proofs, that should not be abstracted away because bridging without waiting is likely costing you more than you're making in returns if you bridge too often.

MetaMask provides an extension to add a wallet feature to your browser so that you can interact with dapps. This was the first project to provide this feature back in the day, but it's now quite outdated; A much better alternative would be Frame. A wallet needs an RPC node to talk to, and a new user doesn't want to have to worry about this, so MetaMask uses Infura as their default. But you can go into settings and change it, either to your own node or to a node hosted by someone else.

As your next step, I'd suggest trying alternative apps for accessing and managing your account(s). I'd personally suggest Frame (https://frame.sh/), but most use MetaMask (which is available as a browser extension).

gotcha, maybe check out frame (https://frame.sh) — you can import any wallets, hardware, seeds, private keys, etc. If you want to use it with any defi, there’s a companion browser extension.

I work on Frame (frame.sh) and used MEW to get a keystore file for testing our import keystore flow. The file I got was a different version (v4) and format from the expected v3, and our import flow does not support it at all. Digging deeper, we use `ethereumjs-wallet` to parse the keystore files - this library does not have a fromV4 method, and the existing fromV3 does not work at all with the MEW file.

Just wanted to install frame.sh as a new web3 wallet. It tells me to add "frame companion" to Edge, it warns me about:

So try MetaMask, or my personal favourite for stuff like this is: http://frame.sh and play around with derivation paths.

Frame Wallet does a few things Rabby doesn't and also supports hardware wallets but lacks the contact security check.