MoreLINQ
v
Our great sponsors
MoreLINQ | v | |
---|---|---|
21 | 219 | |
3,590 | 35,272 | |
1.0% | 0.2% | |
7.8 | 9.9 | |
25 days ago | 2 days ago | |
C# | V | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
MoreLINQ
- What your hidden nuget gems ?
-
Do you know about the DistinctBy method?
You can grab MoreLinq off of Nuget for pre-.NET6 and it has a DistinctBy implementation that you might be able to use: https://github.com/morelinq/MoreLINQ
-
Three words.,, => C# Functional Programming is awesome!!! Do you seasoned developers have any war-stories or nightmare stories regarding Functional Programming?
Install "morelinq" 3.3.2 from Nuget: https://www.nuget.org/packages/morelinq You know you got the right one if it has about 37.2 million downloads.
-
Is there a reason why a WithIndex() extension method isn't apart of the standard library?
If you don't already know about it, I highly recommend checking out the MoreLINQ open source project which adds a bunch of these less common but still occasionally useful extensions to LINQ. They also include an Index method which does exactly what your WithIndex method does, yielding out KeyValuePair entries for each iteration.
- How to remove duplicates from a list, I've tried multiple approaches but with no luck. Can You help me out or point me in the right direction, please. My attempts are in the post
-
Just had a Senior Technical Interview that was so bad and such a waste of time that I burnt that bridge and burnt it hard. If this is how your company interviews people please stop.
yield return is a significant core piece of the framework. It's the basis of which most deferred execution and LINQ is built upon and any extension one would want to add to LINQ. (for example)
-
it feels as though the LINQ queries are inferior to simply using the Enumerable extensions, is there something i'm missing?
For a time, I'd say the Query Syntax was comparatively as popular as the Method Syntax. But over the years as LINQ became ubiquitous for working with non-database queries (LINQ-to-Objects) and more users extended them (for example, MoreLinq) the Method Syntax became more popular. I'd say nowadays the Query Syntax is relatively rare to see and perhaps mostly limited to direct database queries or these scenarios like "join" that are easier.
-
Full outer join in LINQ
I suggest morelinq https://github.com/morelinq/MoreLINQ
-
Things I don't like or confused me in C#
If you don't already know about it, take a gander at the MoreLINQ extensions. I don't think it solves this particular problem, but it's a great example of extending LINQ.
-
-🎄- 2021 Day 1 Solutions -🎄-
It's part of the MoreLinq library. The Window() function code is here.
v
-
V Language Review (2023)
Their site is clearly showing the language is in beta. The V documentation also states that autofree is WIP, and to use the GC instead. This isn't a corporate created language, but looks to be a true volunteer open source effort from people around the world.
Their community, in comparison to others, even has their discussions open and open threads for criticism[1]. These
[1]https://github.com/vlang/v/discussions/7610
-
Towards memory safety with ownership checks for C
V also has this https://github.com/vlang/v/blob/master/doc/docs.md#embed_fil...
- Vlang Release v0.4.4
- Vox: Upcoming open-source browser engine in V
- Building a web blog in V & SQLite
- bultin_write_buf_to_fd_should_use_c_write
- The V Machine Learning Roadmap and Ecosystem
-
Show HN: A new stdlib for Golang focusing on platform native support
Goroutines was the selling point for me until they decided to introduce telemetry in their toolchain; that was what forced me to stop using Golang as a whole.
About GC, I would say: if you implement C++'s RAII mechanism to replace garbage collection, then I believe this project will have a bright future.
My final question is the following: how `pcz` compares to V language, from a syntax's perspective [1]?
[1] https://github.com/vlang/v
- Hopefully, the V developers will establish a relationship with Microsoft.
-
The V Programming Language 0.4
V has the right to exist, have its supporters, and do things its own way. The creator and developers of V, from what I have seen, has always responded well to constructive criticism. Their language has discussions opened at their GitHub, unlike those for various other languages. They even have a thread for what people don't like and want improved about the language[1], again, something many other languages don't have.
A lot of what was going on initially, was coming from obvious competitors, to include being uncivil, inflammatory, and insulting. The initial "criticism" was not so much that, but false accusations of the language being a scam, vaporware, fraud, or didn't really exist. To include attacks and jealousy about its funding and having supporters. This was not any kind of "valid" criticism, that the creator or contributors of the language could reason about.
The "criticism" never died down, but rather after V was open-sourced and established itself on GitHub. The initial series of false accusations could not stand nor could the support it was getting be stopped. So, the rhetoric and targets shifted to whatever could be found to go after on the newly released alpha version of the language and its new website. In that new mix of what was being thrown at it, there were indeed some very valid criticisms, as can be found with any new language.
Constructive and valid criticism, is not the same as insults, trolling, misinformation, rivalry, or false accusations. There is clearly a difference. It's disingenuous to pretend something from one group is the same as the other, or that the intent behind what is being done is not different.
[1] https://github.com/vlang/v/discussions/7610
What are some alternatives?
language-ext - C# functional language extensions - a base class library for functional programming
zig - General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
NetFabric.Hyperlinq - High performance LINQ implementation with minimal heap allocations. Supports enumerables, async enumerables, arrays and Span<T>.
go - The Go programming language
Extensions-And-Utilities-For-Unity - A collection of Extension methods and Utility classes for the System, UnityEngine, and UnityEditor namespaces.
Odin - Odin Programming Language
JFlepp.Maybe - A Maybe type for C#, aimed as an idiomatic port of the option type in F# to C#
Nim - Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).
Curryfy - Provides strongly typed extensions methods for C# delegates to take advantages of functional programming techniques, like currying and partial application.
sokol - minimal cross-platform standalone C headers
Optional - A robust option type for C#
hn-search - Hacker News Search