MongoWebApiStarter VS ASP.NET Core

I just started a project with a vertical slice architecture and got some inspiration from this https://github.com/dj-nitehawk/MongoWebApiStarter

this is the one we use for all our new projects.

yes that's what we do. op should just store the sensitive data as environment variables and let the .net config provider read those values during app runtime. you just need to use the double underscore format for naming the variable paths like so: https://github.com/dj-nitehawk/MongoWebApiStarter/blob/a86342d8585d6659dfd677b485f0f22813e9d861/Template/.linux-server-setup/env-variables.txt

if you feel like jumping heard first, have a look at this starter template i have on github. that's what our team uses for all new web api projects.

planning on doing a video tutorial series building a real world app. in the meantime have a look at this starter template project which handles some of that stuff: https://github.com/dj-nitehawk/MongoWebApiStarter

if you're familiar with mongodb, may i recommend an excellent web-api starter template by yours trully ;-)

if mongodb is an option, have a look at this starter template which uses vertical slice architecture.

here's a starter template project that i use.

look into servicestack and vertical slice architecture. check out this dotnet new template where I've implemented both: https://github.com/dj-nitehawk/MongoWebApiStarter

another huge fan of vertical slices here. but I do it without mediatr and use servicestack instead of mvc. here's an example: https://github.com/dj-nitehawk/MongoWebApiStarter

This approach to organizing middleware enhances code readability, maintainability, and reusability. By following this encapsulation pattern, you're adhering to best practices in ASP.NET Core development, ensuring your application remains well-organized and scalable.

🌟.NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET 9 Preview 2 Discussion ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 Release Notes ➡️EF Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET Aspire preview 4 - .NET Aspire

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/50643

Even if you look at Microsoft’s by far most popular GitHub project, they’re still only half as big as SupaBase. If you believe “the SupaBase story”, SupaBase grew and became twice as large as Microsoft in 3 years. Below is their likes over time if you’re curious, together with a couple of additional “too good to be true” Silicon Valley projects.

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/10117

To achieve these objectives, we will take inspiration from ASP.NET Core Identity's PasswordHasher class. It incorporates a concept of hash versioning, allowing only the number of iterations to be modified.

yes I watched several courses, may be aim not getting clearly. but i worked with asp.net which uses http call and firebase cloud function also which uses socket connection, for socket connection its makes sense to use observable bcoz there streams of data we can observe once the connection establish ,but for http it need to be call every time.

As I'm not utilizing ASP.NET, despite its resource-intensive nature and occasional unpredictability, I prefer the cost-free option. I'm hesitant to invest in EPPlus or engage in trials, and moreover, I am more proficient with Interop. Given the limited volume of records in my department, there's a preference for utilizing tools covered by our existing license. This avoids the need for navigating through layers of approval within the chain of command and ensures compliance with our contractual agreements and Microsoft's patch management, ultimately aligning with a cost-saving mindset.