ModernSSG VS static-site-generator

Well, I was impressed looking at docusaurus implementing so many features to their website. I wanted to work on Theme and Search Engine Optimization that required a lot of effort and knowledge. So, I started with some basic features that support my ModernSSG.

I have seen two other projects so far making an SSG. One of them was in a different language, so that explains how it would look different. The other one - in the same language I used, JS - had a different structure and implementation.

I have been working with open source development for four weeks now. It has been a great pleasure to work with GitHub. After completing pull requests to other developers. Now, I am moving forward to learn to merge changes from different branches. Here's my Swift development code Repo

https://github.com/japneetsingh035/ModernSSG/issues/16 https://github.com/japneetsingh035/ModernSSG/issues/15 https://github.com/japneetsingh035/ModernSSG/issues/17

PR

The formatting made the code hard to read. This was a big one for me, because I spend quite a bit of time making sure my own code is clean and easy to read. I filed an issue under his repo explaining my thoughts with an example of how to clean it up.

[metadata] name = ssg-a-rokay version = 1.0.4 author = Ahmad Rokay author_email = ************* description = Uses python to generate static html files from a single txt or folder of txt files long_description = file: README.md long_description_content_type = text/markdown url = https://github.com/a-rokay/static-site-generator project_urls = Bug Tracker = https://github.com/a-rokay/static-site-generator/issues classifiers = Programming Language :: Python :: 3 License :: OSI Approved :: MIT License Operating System :: OS Independent [options] package_dir = = src packages = find: python_requires = >=3.6 [options.packages.find] where = src

The second part of the lab was to find a partner in our class, and test their continuous integration by implementing a new test case. I chose to work on A-Rokay's static site generator, as it was written in Python so it would be very easy to work on. Here is the Pull Request I made to test their continuous integration.

I began working on a-rokay SSG, which was coded in Python (same language as my SSG that I coded). This made the process of understanding the new codebase simple. Luckily enough, the codebase was filled with comments and very intuitive flow of code. I was quickly able to make changes in the main function, which added the new argument, as well as implemented the ability to read JSON files. Python made it a very simple process.

In order to test Roman's changes, I set up a git remote, fetched, and created a local branch with his changes. Everything went smooth and I was able to see his code.

I chose to add the lang argument and inline code to my project.

Pull request on my project

Readme. He initially had issues running my script because I had forgotten to include proper prerequisites in the readme. He had Python 2.7 installed while my script required Python 3. He also thought I should add snippets of code to the readme, which I did not think was a good idea. Issue.

View the repo on Github.