Log4jAttackSurface VS metamask-extension

Checkout this link for knowing Log4j impact on manufacturers https://github.com/YfryTchsGD/Log4jAttackSurface

Just look at the currently ongoing insanity that is the log4j exploit, and how one single exploit has lead to a generic attack that can impact tons of companies. Imagine if a state decided to use voting machines, and someone found this style of exploit in the system.

Last week (Dec 9th) a major vulnerability was discovered in an open source logging project for Java called log4j. The vulnerability called Log4Shell would allow anyone to remotely run arbitrary code if they sent a message in the right format to the server. This is one of the worst attacks your system can be susceptible to and if you are interested in the technical details of the problem, here is an overview. The attack surface of Log4Shell is staggering, Amazon, Apple, Google, and the Apache Server are affected; it can almost not get bigger than this. We will see the real fallout of Log4Shell in the next weeks and months as right now servers worldwide are being scanned and prodded for this vulnerability.

Companies should verify they are not running any exposed Log4j Java code.  Here is a list of impacted 3rd party software for your reference.  If you find a server at risk, there are three potential ways to fix it as follows.

Looking for vendors/software on known lists like https://github.com/YfryTchsGD/Log4jAttackSurface

Blender ist nicht betroffen, #42

It does and was also affected by log4j.

Thanks, sure it isn't complete but it does contain some scary and surprising (at least when first reading, of course the really aren't) things like: https://github.com/YfryTchsGD/Log4jAttackSurface/blob/master/pages/UniFi.md

Apparently there's proof Steam along with many others are vulnerable.

Have an Ethereum wallet, preferably Metamask installed.

A  Metamask Account.

Plenty of projects are source-available, but not open source, and get tons of issues, and even contributions (https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension off the top of my head)

You can create an attestation based on an existing schema or create your own. Schemas define the format in which attestations will be made, and in this case, we will use the Is Human schema to attest that the owner of a certain address is human. For this example, you only need to connect your Metamask wallet (or any wallet) to Scroll Sepolia, then enter the address you want to attest and click Make attestation. You can choose whether you want the off-chain attestation, i.e., free, obtained only by signing a transaction. Alternatively, you can choose to make it on-chain and pay for the transaction to make it public and connect it to smart contract logic. In this case, you will need to obtain funds in Scroll Sepolia through a Scroll Sepolia Faucet.

Metamask (9000 GitHub Stars) https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension

For this tutorial you will need Metamask or other wallet of your choice, with Scroll Sepolia funds that you can get from a Sepolia faucet and then bridge them to L2 using the Scroll Sepolia bridge. Alternatively, you can use a Scroll Sepolia Faucet to get funds directly on L2.

16) Open Metamask app. In this instruction we will use Metamask extension for Chrome browser.

> I get a 3-5 sec lag on launch [0] as it prepares the browser to block ads.

uBO is typically ready in a fraction of second, so "3-5 sec" is not normal. In Firefox all extensions sit in the same process, so it's possible another extension is preventing uBO to be ready in a timely manner, this has happened[1].

[1] https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/issues/13163