Kards VS stylegan2-pytorch

I've posted here a couple of times about a project I'm part of - Alteka Kards. An amazing 7,500 downloads of Kards 1.2.0 later (and over 10k across all releases!), we're excited to release Kards 1.3.0. This new release wraps up a number of updates, bringing you more features, new cards and bugfixes. Existing Kards 1.2.0 installations should prompt to update, or download at https://alteka.solutions/kards

Alteka Kards has a sync mode, you can run the online version on your phone browser. It's a really nice tool, and free!

Honestly I just use Kards to get my projector area dialed in, then put Blender on my screen and model the geometry. It's sort of the guerrilla way to get it done but it works and it's free

Check out link they also have a online version too. You’ll need to use a laptop or web browser to access this.

https://alteka.solutions/kards https://alteka.solutions/kards-online

I'm not sure if you are looking for videos encoded using different codex or test videos to send out to an encoder. If it's the latter check out these guys, there test patterns are fantastic https://alteka.solutions/kards

There are some slightly newer flat screen TVs that only have 1 or 2 frames of delay with composite, but it needs experimentation to find good ones (if you are doing this, use something like https://alteka.solutions/kards which has a frame sync mode. Set up a screen playing that, place the screen to test next to it, point the camera to test at the kards monitor, then using another camera film both screens. This will show the number of frames of latency between the kards screen and the test screen which will also include the test cameras latency). The old Sony/Panasonic OB van portable analogue monitor type things are the safest bet.

export default function ChannelListBottomBar(): JSX.Element { const { client } = useChatContext(); const [micActive, setMicActive] = useState(false); const [audioActive, setAudioActive] = useState(false); return (

{client.user?.image && (

div> )}

{client.user?.name} span> {client.user?.online ? 'Online' : 'Offline'} span> p> button>

setMicActive((currentValue) => !currentValue)} > button> setAudioActive((currentValue) => !currentValue)} > button> button> div> ); }

I wonder if we will ever get a realism model which can produce normal faces like https://thispersondoesnotexist.com instead of like super symmetrical faces of models

this has been in circulation since a while AI images took off, and they certainly weren't convincing before they did. You know the old "try to name one thing in this image" macro? Pretty sure that was AI generated, there was also thispersondoesnotexist.com which was always pretty good but of course it is

Not the workflow for these images, but if you easily want to spice up your gens with a bit more natural look, try using images from thispersondoesnotexist.com with IPAdapter face model.

...then they just use the app on generated images of not real people (potentially based on specific inputs to remind you of a real person).

Also we can generate very realistic faces with AI, https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ (old example), fully 3D faces are doable at this point. So in another 5-10 years a low profile model like him wouldn't even be hired for this, they would just generate a digital face model. Unionizing will only speed up studios adoption of digital replacements.

It looks like they all use a profile picture made with https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/