JetBrainsRuntime VS intellij-community

JetBrains have their tweaks to the JRE available: https://github.com/JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime

The major problems begin when you want to leverage the GPU or multimedia components in which case you would want something else.

Jetbrains Runtime – this is bundled with IntelliJ and Android Studio, but with patches focused on optimization for use within an Interactive Development Environment context – doing incremental builds, hot reload of class definition, and embedded Chromium in the runtime. I do not believe the added features are useful for building and archiving Android Applications for distribution, but it will work non-the-less.

https://github.com/JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime

Also with 'Java on Truffle' on GraalVM you can use enhanced class reloading

However, I am running IntelliJ on Asahi since June already. They did not provide offical Linux arm64 support, but what since May, when they released the first 2022.2 EAP, they switched to JBR 17 (the JetBrains Java Runtime). JBR 17. Fortunatly, in May, they started to release JBR builds for Linux am64, starting with JBR 17.0.3-b463.3. That meant we had everything we needed to run IntelliJ on Asahi: I just had to set the env var IDEA_JDK=/path/to/arm64/jbr/ to make IntelliJ use the correct JBR. Besides that it was necessary to download a fsnotifier version that was build for arm64 and set the path in ~/.config/JetBrains/IntelliJIdea2022.3/idea.properties.

Have you tried the JetBrains Runtime with DCEVM? https://github.com/JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime/releases/tag/jbr17.0.2b396.4

This project's key is replacing x86_64 Jetbrains Runtime (https://github.com/JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime) to arm64 Jetbrains Runtime. Arctic Fox IntelliJ Core version is 2020.3.1, maybe google upgrade core version to 2021.1 as soon as possible. (IntelliJ Core version 2021.1 released at a few days ago.)

https://github.com/JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime

Also, no BuSL stupidity, they're all Apache 2 AFAIK: https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community/blob/idea/23...

And the "all you can eat" toolbox license is just a staggeringly good deal, IMHO, which also comes with a "you can keep your license forever, just no updates" which is way different from setting subscription-based licensing money on fire when your license expires. Whoever came up with that should be applauded because it really drives down my "what about" anxiety of paying subscription money for IDEs

I readily admit I am not familiar enough with fossil to know about the impedance mismatch, but I'll point out that https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-plugins/tree/idea/241.... https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community/tree/idea/24... https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community/tree/idea/24... https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community/tree/idea/24... may a long way toward finding how they think about those operations

There is quite a bit going on in our view’s class, so we'll take it slow and go through its functions one by one, according to their importance. The first thing we need to do is to create the structure our items will fit into. com.intellij.ui.treeStructure.Tree seems to best match our needs, and that’s what we’ll use. In order to prepare it for what is coming, we need to configure it.

I think it's time to wrap it up. We've made a pull request to the IDEA developers, and I've accomplished the tasks I set out to do. I'm really happy to help the developers of my favorite IDE.

I offer, again, my JetBrains GrammarKit counterpoint from the last time that assertion came up <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38192427>

>>>

I consider the JetBrains parsing system to be world class and they seem to hand-write very few (instead building on this system: https://github.com/JetBrains/Grammar-Kit#readme )

- https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community/blob/idea/23... (the parser I'll concede, as they do seem to be hand-rolling that part)

- https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community/blob/idea/23... (same for its parser)

- https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community/blob/idea/23... and https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community/blob/idea/23...

- https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-plugins/blob/idea/233.... and https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-plugins/blob/idea/233....

I had the same experience with OmniGraffle, https://www.omnigroup.com/omnigraffle

It just worked. There was support. I wouldn't dig a hole in the ground with my bare hands, why wouldn't I use good tools. Of course I would like to use F/OSS for various reasons.

The model I absolutely love is Jetbrains, their core product is OSS, Apache licensed. The whole thing, totally usable. https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community

The money I send their way does both, it pays for developers and it puts an amazing artifact in the world that others can use and learn from. If they weren't open source, I wouldnt pay for it. I don't know how many others are the same as me, but Jetbrains really deserves credit here.

# https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community/blob/idea/233.9802.14/json/src/jsonSchema/schema.json#L52

and also FOSS (Apache 2): https://github.com/JetBrains/intellij-community (as well as PyCharm found in the "python" subdirectory)