ImageStore VS Photo Stream

This one (Image Store) looks promising, but it's still pretty young and doesn't have quite all of the features I'm looking for. But it looks like Google Photos and lets you create your own albums, which is half the battle for me.

If you want to check out the changes regarding the enter-pressing, and creating new albums, then I pushed them to https://github.com/gregordr/ImageStore/tree/album-fixes

since the description (and the link) was removed, and i hate data deletion, here's the link https://github.com/gregordr/ImageStore

I stumbled over this just recently. Its kind of an opensource alternative to Google IMage storing. It is hostable with docker in your local network (basically offline). The Dev also made a demo website here. You can check it out. If you click on an image it will be opened and on the right top corner there is an Info button. There you can see it also has labels/tags and stuff. Not sure if it has sort filters, but you can create albums and folders, so that makes sorting filter obsolete maybe.

I run Plex, 3 instances of photo-stream, a couple HomeKit related automations, librespeed, an api for my lametric clock, and a few really simple web pages like a darts scoreboard and a weather page.

Photo Stream - Minimalist self-hosted photo stream. (Demo)

Docker c’est un système pour faire des containers (une sorte de virtualisation mais plus simple qu’une vm) et le Dockerfile ce sont les instructions pour construire ce container (ici on part d’un container avec ruby installé, on télécharge vips, on le compile, on copie le contenu du dossier d’où tu le lance dans le containers, on va dans ce dossier, on installe bunder, jekyll et les dépendances de photo-stream, on expose le port 4000 pour jekyll et on lance jekyll). Même sans utiliser docker un Dockerfile peut être une bonne indication des commandes à faire pour installer un truc.