Grassmann.jl VS gutenberg

Here's how to do it with Grassmann.jl

Surprise announcement: the next version of Grassmann.jl has a new algebra type SimplexComplex{V,B,T} (yes, that's right SimplexComplex) which is a wrapper for Julia's native Base.Complex{T} type. This allows you to work with the performance of the base language complex numbers while retaining the Grassmann algebra interface and additional products. The new type is not limited to only regular complex numbers, it supports the creation of a SimplexComplex using any basis element B by simply taking the sum of a scalar with that basis element. ```Julia julia> using Grassmann

I still have never been able to post my paper about my Grassmann.jl geometric algebra foundations research on arxiv.

https://github.com/chakravala/Grassmann.jl

Seems like a useless overrated website.

I was able to post my article on my own website instead.

Arxiv is really a useless website.

This article is really about geometric algebra, check out my geometric algebra software https://github.com/chakravala/Grassmann.jl

https://github.com/chakravala/Grassmann.jl

In the future, geometric algebra will likely be part of everything we do, but it is still very unknown as of now.

I heart your Grassman gradient vector field representations: https://github.com/chakravala/Grassmann.jl. They, heh heh, point the way toward representing aspects of physics and math that should be used far more frequently than they are now. They display the quirks that you could never apprehend looking at an equation. Your representations could eviscerate the representations of data base on paper-like metaphors.

Sadly our leaders, the John Baez and Scott Aronson and people like that, prefer to think in Euler notation and WordPress posts. As Kurt Vonnegut said: So it goes.

The world of representation of difficult concepts using interactive 3D and elegant code is still in its infancy. You are not yet at the ground floor of the construction of a future elegant structure. You - and a few others - are in at the second basement.

Fortunately, the only way out is to look up!

Case study 3: Zola

So after shopping around a bit I found a simple, dependency-less static site generator called Zola. The lack of dependencies sounded very attractive after all the headaches trying to update my Gatsby modules. I wanted to give Zola a try and see what tradeoffs I would need to make coming form a React-based framework to this Rust-based generator.

I think you're thinking about Zola: https://github.com/getzola/zola

But yes, if I were to recommend something, it'd be Zola given that there's just one executable that you need to run and there's absolutely no setup required.

If I were to start again from scratch, I'd likely use Zola as SSG (https://www.getzola.org/)

I've used Zola (https://github.com/getzola/zola) for a static project homepage a few years ago to showcase examples with a simple description and a wasm app embedded in the page, it worked perfectly for me and the docs was clear on how to use it. It was very easy to set up along with a GitHub action to automatically update the wasm binaries when needed. It is definitely a tool I keep in my mental toolbox as a good default.

I'm currently learning https://www.getzola.org/.

It's more manual than idy like but it's gonna be for a small personal and work website so I don't mind much.

It's super fast.

Doesn't seem to fit your use casr but still.