Frametime
vtebench
Frametime | vtebench | |
---|---|---|
3 | 5 | |
3 | 284 | |
- | 0.0% | |
1.8 | 0.0 | |
over 3 years ago | over 1 year ago | |
C | Rust | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Frametime
-
Just How Much Faster Are the Gnome 46 Terminals?
Not the author, but I did this same project a few years back, these were the results back then: https://jnsn.dev/posts/fastisslow/ with a guide https://github.com/DelusionalLogic/Frametime if you want to replicate it.
-
Ben Eater || How does a USB keyboard work?
I made a project doing a USB hid keyboard and serial device. It's fairly small, so should be easy to read.
- Input lag measurement tool using an ATmega32u4
vtebench
-
Just How Much Faster Are the Gnome 46 Terminals?
https://github.com/alacritty/vtebench/tree/master
-
Show HN: Warp, a Rust-based terminal for the modern age
Hey - that's a good point. The thing about terminal benchmarks is that there are many of them, each focusing on a different aspect and producing different results. There's one by alacritty team[1] that we used in our initial tests[2], there's another ones mentioned in the comments above etc. When using vtbench, Warp performed much better than iterm, for example.
Ideally we'd ace all of them, but we're not there yet. Anecdotally, many of our users mention speed/performance improvements over other terminal apps a lot in our Discord!
[1] https://github.com/alacritty/vtebench
-
How Warp Works
The diagram below shows the output of vtebench for scrolling in various terminals. For some reason Hyper generally could not handle running the benchmarks at all and did not terminate after a reasonable amount of time.
-
Top 3 GPU-Accelerated Terminal Emulators
It's not easy to measure the performance of terminal apps. But I definitely notice a difference compared to let's say iTerm2, especially when scrolling through large files in Vim. Alacritty claims that it's faster than the competition using vtebench as a benchmarking tool. Kitty claims that the CPU usage is slightly increased compared to xterm (6-8% compared to 5-7%), but that scrolling is smoother.
- Alacritty vs Kitty
What are some alternatives?
tinyusb - An open source cross-platform USB stack for embedded system
vte - Parser for virtual terminal emulators
qmk_firmware - Open-source keyboard firmware for Atmel AVR and Arm USB families
Warp - Warp is a modern, Rust-based terminal with AI built in so you and your team can build great software, faster.
lufa - LUFA - the Lightweight USB Framework for AVRs.
glassbench - A micro-benchmark framework to use with cargo bench
warp - Secure and simple terminal sharing
benchmark-scratchpad - A quick scratchpad for benchmarking Rust code
upterm - A terminal emulator for the 21st century.
glkitty - port of the OpenGL gears demo to kitty terminal graphics protocol
wezterm - A GPU-accelerated cross-platform terminal emulator and multiplexer written by @wez and implemented in Rust
Windows Terminal - The new Windows Terminal and the original Windows console host, all in the same place!