FragNav VS architecture-components-samples

I use fragNav for most of project.

I think it's a fairly complex app, ~100 screens with a lot of custom transitions/animation and I'm still using dagger-android with custom scoping 😅. I would say before dagger hilt the nav library was pretty rough to use, we had to use a lot of dirty workarounds and nested fragments to get desired behavior. Right now it's in a really good spot. My biggest issues now are with how the IDE editor works; it can be really annoying about edge case features (like graph level args) and it inhales memory. I think alternatives like fragNav are much better for smaller projects.

https://github.com/android/architecture-components-samples/ was historically better

uh, maybe https://github.com/android/architecture-components-samples/tree/a87535608564103423415baddb1e586f0337be44/LiveDataSample/app/src/main/java/com/android/example/livedatabuilder

But Google invented a set of guidelines in "Guide to App Architecture" in 2017 which you can see here in action that after the re-org the new devrels didn't really understand so they ended up making their own version of "clean architecture" where the data layer depends on the domain layer and not vice versa, + never learned how top-level layering like this doesn't even scale ever and they should be creating components, not "layers".

5.) check the https://github.com/android/architecture-components-samples/ repo for samples (if it is a Google library, and only for some things)

When I take the advanced navigation project and update it's dependency to navigation 2.4.0 we get the working backstack as shown here.

That's still an issue .

Hey guys, Im trying to recognise more about api calls in a contemporary architecture. I am using retrofit with livedata/coroutines to make my api calls, but I'm struggling with error handling. Most of the solutions I find, even in googles own example, includes writing a wrapper around your api request and handle the error that. It seems overly complicated and frankly stupid to do something like that for, what I consider at least, rudimentary functionality. Even with Dart/Flutter, google has made this easy ‏‏‎ with async/await and Futures. Am I being lazy to think that if even google needs to write extra code to solve a common use case, they should probably add it to the framework? I dont know, maybe I just needed venting.. what do you think? google's project: https://github.com/android/architecture-components-samples/tree/master/GithubBrowserSample

/uj if you're reeeeaaaalyyyy interested, I found them here lol