FormCoreJS VS brainfuck-web-app

>The core implementation is under 700 lines of JS, including the parser: https://github.com/moonad/FormCoreJS/blob/master/FormCore.js

Unfortunately, the source code size isn't the main problem with provers. The UX is much more important one.

Kind is a functional, general-purpose programming language featuring theorems and proofs. It has the smallest core, a pretty solid JavaScript and Scheme compiler (seriously, check how clean is the generated kind.js), and a syntax that is a middle ground between Haskell and TypeScript, in an attempt to make it more accessible.

Hello! Kind is a functional programming language based on self types that has the smallest core, pretty solid JavaScript and Scheme compilers (seriously, check how clean is the generated kind.js is), and a syntax that is a middle ground between Haskell and TypeScript, in an attempt to make it more accessible. In short, it is a general-purpose, practical functional featuring featuring theorems and proofs. Kind still has a lot to evolve, but, at this point in time, it is one of the most mature proof languages in some aspects. We do research related to optimal evaluators, we explore self types, we build web apps (most are in development, but the performance is stellar), and we're close to have great inter-op with Haskell (one file away), EVM compilers (a linearity-checker away). All in all, I believe Kind is a great addition to the functional programming community. We are a small, mostly self-funded team.

> Javascripts can be different, there is no guarantee that some half supported engine will run that specific code.

Half supported? Where is your source? Java Nashhorn was passing all ECMAScript 5.1 tests in 2012 (https://twitter.com/asz/status/258995374847565825)

> Same as brainfuck: https://github.com/EvanHahn/brainfuck-web-app

Brainfuck? JavaScript is most popular programming language (https://www.stackscale.com/blog/most-popular-programming-lan...) You're comparing apples to oranges. By the way I mostly work in Java, but I do not look down on JavaScript, it's shows ignorance.

As others have already said, person who wrote the library may not be familiar with your favorite language, moreover certain things are easier to do in some languages. This is not the attitude that we should be showing when receiving free work from someone. If you don't want to port it to your favorite language when needed that's ok, I'm just glad that it exists.

Has been done