Flux.jl
tensorflow
Flux.jl | tensorflow | |
---|---|---|
22 | 223 | |
4,393 | 182,456 | |
0.4% | 0.5% | |
8.7 | 10.0 | |
about 15 hours ago | 6 days ago | |
Julia | C++ | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Flux.jl
- Julia 1.10 Released
-
What Apple hardware do I need for CUDA-based deep learning tasks?
If you are really committed to running on Apple hardware then take a look at Tensorflow for macOS. Another option is the Julia programming language which has very basic Metal support at a CUDA-like level. FluxML would be the ML framework in Julia. I’m not sure either option will be painless or let you do everything you could do with a Nvidia GPU.
-
[D] ClosedAI license, open-source license which restricts only OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, and Meta from commercial use
Flux dominance!
-
What would be your programming language of choice to implement a JIT compiler ?
I’m no compiler expert but check out flux and zygote https://fluxml.ai/ https://fluxml.ai/
-
Any help or tips for Neural Networks on Computer Clusters
I would suggest you to look into Julia ecosystem instead of C++. Julia is almost identical to Python in terms of how you use it but it's still very fast. You should look into flux.jl package for Julia.
-
[D] Why are we stuck with Python for something that require so much speed and parallelism (neural networks)?
Give Julia a try: https://fluxml.ai
-
Deep Learning With Flux: Loss Doesn't Converge
2) Flux treats softmax a little different than most other activation functions (see here for more details) such as relu and sigmoid. When you pass an activation function into a layer like Dense(3, 32, relu), Flux expects that the function is broadcast over the layer's output. However, softmax cannot be broadcast as it operates over vectors rather than scalars. This means that if you want to use softmax as the final activation in your model, you need to pass it into Chain() like so:
-
“Why I still recommend Julia”
Can you point to a concrete example of one that someone would run into when using the differential equation solvers with the default and recommended Enzyme AD for vector-Jacobian products? I'd be happy to look into it, but there do not currently seem to be any correctness issues in the Enzyme issue tracker that are current (3 issues are open but they all seem to be fixed, other than https://github.com/EnzymeAD/Enzyme.jl/issues/278 which is actually an activity analysis bug in LLVM). So please be more specific. The issue with Enzyme right now seems to moreso be about finding functional forms that compile, and it throws compile-time errors in the event that it cannot fully analyze the program and if it has too much dynamic behavior (example: https://github.com/EnzymeAD/Enzyme.jl/issues/368).
Additional note, we recently did a overhaul of SciMLSensitivity (https://sensitivity.sciml.ai/dev/) and setup a system which amounts to 15 hours of direct unit tests doing a combinatoric check of arguments with 4 hours of downstream testing (https://github.com/SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl/actions/runs/25...). What that identified is that any remaining issues that can arise are due to the implicit parameters mechanism in Zygote (Zygote.params). To counteract this upstream issue, we (a) try to default to never default to Zygote VJPs whenever we can avoid it (hence defaulting to Enzyme and ReverseDiff first as previously mentioned), and (b) put in a mechanism for early error throwing if Zygote hits any not implemented derivative case with an explicit error message (https://github.com/SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl/blob/v7.0.1/src...). We have alerted the devs of the machine learning libraries, and from this there has been a lot of movement. In particular, a globals-free machine learning library, Lux.jl, was created with fully explicit parameters https://lux.csail.mit.edu/dev/, and thus by design it cannot have this issue. In addition, the Flux.jl library itself is looking to do a redesign that eliminates implicit parameters (https://github.com/FluxML/Flux.jl/issues/1986). Which design will be the one in the end, that's uncertain right now, but it's clear that no matter what the future designs of the deep learning libraries will fully cut out that part of Zygote.jl. And additionally, the other AD libraries (Enzyme and Diffractor for example) do not have this "feature", so it's an issue that can only arise from a specific (not recommended) way of using Zygote (which now throws explicit error messages early and often if used anywhere near SciML because I don't tolerate it).
So from this, SciML should be rather safe and if not, please share some details and I'd be happy to dig in.
- Flux: The Elegant Machine Learning Stack
-
Jax vs. Julia (Vs PyTorch)
> In his item #1, he links to https://discourse.julialang.org/t/loaderror-when-using-inter... The issue is actually a Zygote bug, a Julia package for auto-differentiation, and is not directly related to Julia codebase (or Flux package) itself. Furthermore, the problematic code is working fine now, because DiffEqFlux has switched to Enzyme, which doesn't have that bug. He should first confirm whether the problem he is citing is actually a problem or not.
> Item #2, again another Zygote bug.
If flux chose a buggy package as a dependency, that's on them, and users are well justified in steering clear of Flux if it has buggy dependencies. As of today, the Project.toml for both Flux and DiffEqFlux still lists Zygote as a dependency. Neither list Enzyme.
https://github.com/FluxML/Flux.jl/blob/master/Project.toml
tensorflow
-
Side Quest Devblog #1: These Fakes are getting Deep
# L2-normalize the encoding tensors image_encoding = tf.math.l2_normalize(image_encoding, axis=1) audio_encoding = tf.math.l2_normalize(audio_encoding, axis=1) # Find euclidean distance between image_encoding and audio_encoding # Essentially trying to detect if the face is saying the audio # Will return nan without the 1e-12 offset due to https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/issues/12071 d = tf.norm((image_encoding - audio_encoding) + 1e-12, ord='euclidean', axis=1, keepdims=True) discriminator = keras.Model(inputs=[image_input, audio_input], outputs=[d], name="discriminator")
-
Google lays off its Python team
[3]: https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/graphs/contributors
- TensorFlow-metal on Apple Mac is junk for training
-
🔥🚀 Top 10 Open-Source Must-Have Tools for Crafting Your Own Chatbot 🤖💬
To get up to speed with TensorFlow, check their quickstart Support TensorFlow on GitHub ⭐
- One .gitignore to rule them all
-
10 Github repositories to achieve Python mastery
Explore here.
-
GitHub and Developer Ecosystem Control
Part of the major userbase pull in GitHub revolves around hosting a considerable number of popular projects including Angular, React, Kubernetes, cpython, Ruby, tensorflow, and well even the software that powers this site Forem.
-
Non-determinism in GPT-4 is caused by Sparse MoE
Right but that's not an inherent GPU determinism issue. It's a software issue.
https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/issues/3103#issueco... is correct that it's not necessary, it's a choice.
Your line of reasoning appears to be "GPUs are inherently non-deterministic don't be quick to judge someone's code" which as far as I can tell is dead wrong.
Admittedly there are some cases and instructions that may result in non-determinism but they are inherently necessary. The author should thinking carefully before introducing non-determinism. There are many scenarios where it is irrelevant, but ultimately the issue we are discussing here isn't the GPU's fault.
-
Can someone explain how keras code gets into the Tensorflow package?
and things like y = layers.ELU()(y) work as expected. I wanted to see a list of the available layers so I went to the Tensorflow GitHub repository and to the keras directory. There's a warning in that directory that says:
-
Is it even possible to design a ML model without using Python or MATLAB? Like using C++, C or Java?
Exactly what language do you think TensorFlow is written in? :)
What are some alternatives?
Pytorch - Tensors and Dynamic neural networks in Python with strong GPU acceleration
PaddlePaddle - PArallel Distributed Deep LEarning: Machine Learning Framework from Industrial Practice (『飞桨』核心框架,深度学习&机器学习高性能单机、分布式训练和跨平台部署)
Knet.jl - Koç University deep learning framework.
Prophet - Tool for producing high quality forecasts for time series data that has multiple seasonality with linear or non-linear growth.
Transformers.jl - Julia Implementation of Transformer models
Pandas - Flexible and powerful data analysis / manipulation library for Python, providing labeled data structures similar to R data.frame objects, statistical functions, and much more
Torch.jl - Sensible extensions for exposing torch in Julia.
LightGBM - A fast, distributed, high performance gradient boosting (GBT, GBDT, GBRT, GBM or MART) framework based on decision tree algorithms, used for ranking, classification and many other machine learning tasks.
Lux.jl - Explicitly Parameterized Neural Networks in Julia
scikit-learn - scikit-learn: machine learning in Python
flax - Flax is a neural network library for JAX that is designed for flexibility.
LightFM - A Python implementation of LightFM, a hybrid recommendation algorithm.