FlutterSwift
flutter-elinux
FlutterSwift | flutter-elinux | |
---|---|---|
2 | 3 | |
12 | 391 | |
- | 2.3% | |
8.5 | 7.4 | |
4 days ago | 21 days ago | |
C | Dart | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
FlutterSwift
-
Writing Gnome Apps with Swift
https://github.com/TokamakUI/Tokamak
Iām also working (slowly) on native Flutter channels:
https://github.com/PADL/FlutterSwift
But this is really targeted at embedded use cases.
-
Jitsi Meet Flutter SDK
FWIW I've been working on a native Swift implementation of Flutter channels [1], so I can use Swift for business logic with Sony's embedded Flutter embedder [2]. Probably a niche interest, but I'd prefer to write Swift than Dart, and there's no Objective-C runtime on Linux (so I can't use the default Darwin embedder).
[1] https://github.com/PADL/FlutterSwift
flutter-elinux
- Jitsi Meet Flutter SDK
- Debugging on Raspberry Pi
-
Ask HN: Flutter vs. React Native ā which one do you prefer?
Flutter, for sure. It feels like a much more thoughtful system overall. I'm not as impressed with the Dart ecosystem as I am with the Flutter one, mostly because the Dart ecosystem lacks widely used/supported frameworks for server-side development. I would LOVE to completely remove Javascript from my life and if there were a solid server-side framework for Dart, I could use it literally everywhere.
Re your problems:
1. Yeah, break widgets down. Yes, it's more work, but it's necessary in the same way that breaking code down into smaller functions is necessary. You don't just cram everything into one file and you shouldn't expect that a mega-widget will be the right way either.
2. Flutter for web is still very early on. You should know that there are two renderers (one that uses canvas and one that uses real dom elements), but they're both just "okay" at this point. They have been rapidly improving however -- the difference between now and this time last year is significant. It'll keep getting better and in the mean time, it's usable enough. The download sizes are huge and sometimes rendering can be a little janky, but again: it'll get better. For me, the promise of a unified system for desktop, web, mobile, and even some limited 3rd party embedded Linux support (https://github.com/sony/flutter-elinux) is really appealing.
What are some alternatives?
ffigen - FFI binding generator
flutter-embedded-linux - Embedded Linux embedding for Flutter
egress - Export and record WebRTC sessions and tracks
compose-multiplatform - Compose Multiplatform, a modern UI framework for Kotlin that makes building performant and beautiful user interfaces easy and enjoyable.
client-sdk-js - LiveKit browser client SDK (javascript)
compose-samples - Official Jetpack Compose samples.
zulip-flutter - Future Zulip client using Flutter
sharik - Sharik is an open-source, cross-platform solution for sharing files via Wi-Fi or Mobile Hotspot
livekit - End-to-end stack for WebRTC. SFU media server and SDKs.
harmonoid - šµ Elegant music app to play & manage music library. YouTube Music client. Lyrics & Playlists. [Moved to: https://github.com/harmonoid/harmonoid]
gallery - Flutter Gallery was a resource to help developers evaluate and use Flutter
pangolin_desktop - Pangolin Desktop UI shell, designed for dahliaOS, written in Flutter.