Descent-2 VS text-to-diagram-site

Try not to read too much into that, the MIT license was in the original blank repo I started with. There are a few questions I need to get answered, so the lack of that file doesn't necessarily mean anything about the license. The previous Descent 1&2 releases were under the license seen here, I would expect that at minimum (minimum permissibility-wise):

https://github.com/OpenSourcedGames/Descent-2

I'm hoping the owners will be able to agree to MIT, but we're doing due diligence right now.

Yeah, D2's source code was released way back in 1999!

One of those "text to diagram" contenders did a comparison website (open source) a while back: https://text-to-diagram.com/ (nomnoml isn't in there).

Community list of comparisons between Text to Diagram tools: https://text-to-diagram.com/

https://text-to-diagram.com/?example=sequence&b=mermaid

If you can get enough data out of the ticket system, maybe something like https://text-to-diagram.com/ will help.

We made a site to let people compare: https://text-to-diagram.com . (Mermaid maintainers contribute to it)

I think Mermaid is better than PlantUML to write something quickly.

But D2 looks very promising. I like the simpler and more intuitive syntax.

https://text-to-diagram.com/

have you seen https://text-to-diagram.com/ for comparing these flowcharts including mermaidJS and graphwiz as you mentioned and there are a few more there.

Yes, it's a limited generator, because it's like 20 lines long and not the point of the article.

If you want to compare Mermaid against D2, take a look at https://text-to-diagram.com. The maintainers of Mermaid have contributed to it.

For a comparison with other popular text-to-diagram tools: https://text-to-diagram.com (the maintainers of Mermaid have contributed to this).

Comparison to other diagramming languages you might've heard of: https://text-to-diagram.com. (contributors of Mermaid themselves have contributed to it)