Decompose VS kotlinx.serialization

I use Decompose, although I also have a kmp project which that supports. I find the compose extensions providing a very easy API when integrating with compose.

For one of our apps we used https://arkivanov.github.io/Decompose/ for navigation. It is mentioned in the Compose Multiplatform repo, but we found it pretty obscure to use and it has some confusing concepts built in.

View model is Googles recommended approach, but there are other approaches out their you can use like decompose

When you are building your app in KMM, sometimes you need to pack some libraries along with project files in the shared module. For example if you are using Decompose you need to access it's Value class in Swift.

I don't have much experience with conductor, so I'm curious what your concerns about lifecycle is lacking compared to fragments? But if your team already knows that framework I might just stick with views over fragments. I see there is a compose integration if you do ever plan on picking that up with conductor. Otherwise compose makes fragments obsolete and your team already knows conductor. I do agree the navigation story in compose is not mature especially after jetpack compose navigation. But there are other 3rd party libraries like compose destinations or decompose, but would be nice to see something better 1st party.

I personally like decompose for its testability, clear separation of concerns, and apis for compose animations. Plus it's multiplatform so you can use it for other kmp targets.

Full discretion, all my new apps are built using mvi with MVIKotlin and decompose for the compose extensions for navigation animations. A sample project I have built with that architecture can be found here.

Check out Decompose, it's multiplatform - https://github.com/arkivanov/Decompose

Decompose

Have you tried this:? https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx.serialization/blob/master/docs/serializers.md

Regardless, I followed the documentation to register List for polymorphic serialization and my static code analysis does not seem to be happy with it.

I think kotlinx.serialization might come close, but looks like custom Encoders and Decoders are still experimental.

This example will not work on a multiplatform project. you are using gson, gson runs only on jvm, you should use https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx.serialization for the json parsing

This is the issue to +1 https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx.serialization/issues/1931

Fun fact, kotlinx.serialization had a release just recently which makes it come with some bundled proguard rules to make this experience easier. Yes you'll still have issues if you're using things via reflection and try to serialize things that proguard deemed unused and removed them, but it's a step forward https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx.serialization/releases/tag/v1.5.0-RC

Kotlin Serialization

Kotlin Serialization is also a newer option, but doesn't have as much traction.

``` see the docs