DaemonMode.jl
JET.jl
Our great sponsors
DaemonMode.jl | JET.jl | |
---|---|---|
22 | 13 | |
269 | 688 | |
- | - | |
4.7 | 9.1 | |
4 months ago | 4 days ago | |
Julia | Julia | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
DaemonMode.jl
-
Potential of the Julia programming language for high energy physics computing
Thats for an entry point, you can search `Base.@main` to see a little summary of it. Later it will be able to be callable with `juliax` and `juliac` i.e. `~juliax test.jl` in shell.
DynamicalSystems looks like a heavy project. I don't think you can do much more on your own. There have been recent features in 1.10 that lets you just use the portion you need (just a weak dependency), and there is precompiletools.jl but these are on your side.
You can also look into https://github.com/dmolina/DaemonMode.jl for running a Julia process in the background and do your stuff in the shell without startup time until the standalone binaries are there.
-
Julia 1.9.0 lives up to its promise
> If I were to use e.g. Rust with polars, load time would be virtually none.
Because you're compiling...
And if you need to do the same in Julia, you should also pre-compile or some other method like https://github.com/dmolina/DaemonMode.jl (their demo shows loading a database, with subsequent loads after the first one taking roughly ~0.2% of the first)
- Administrative Scripting with Julia
- GNU Octave 8.1
-
Ask HN: Why is Julia so underrated?
Well, not nicely certainly, but:
https://github.com/dmolina/DaemonMode.jl
> portable
Neither is python - it just relies on universal availability. Over timeā¦
-
Is Julia suitable today as a scripting language?
You can get around a lot of these problems with DaemonMode.jl though.
-
Julia performance, startup.jl, and sysimages
You might want DaemonMode.jl
-
Can I execute code in Julia REPL if I'm connected to a remote server?
https://github.com/dmolina/DaemonMode.jl can possibly help in the future. Leaving it here so that people know this is planned.
- Ask HN: Why hasn't the Deep Learning community embraced Julia yet?
-
Compile for faster execution?
If you strongly prefer to run scripts though, then you can use the package https://github.com/dmolina/DaemonMode.jl in order to re-use a Julia session between multiple scripts, saving you recompilation time.
JET.jl
-
Prospects of utilising Rust in scientific computation?
An informative discussion on julia forum. Have you tried using https://github.com/aviatesk/JET.jl to minimize type instabilities?
-
Julia v1.9.0 has been released
For instance, https://github.com/aviatesk/JET.jl is still in its relative infancy, but it's played a big role in detecting quite a few potential bugs that had never been reported to use by users or caught in our testing infrastructure. There's also been a lot developments like interfaces to RR the time travelling debugger https://rr-project.org/ which helps us better understand and catch some very hard to debug non-deterministic bugs.
-
Julia Computing Raises $24M Series A
Have you seen Shuhei Tadowaki's work on JET.jl (?)
If you're curious: https://github.com/aviatesk/JET.jl
This may seem more about performance (than IDE development) but Shuhei is one of the driving contributors behind developing the capabilities to use compiler capabilities for IDE integration -- and indeed JET.jl contains the kernel of a number of these capabilities.
-
I Hate Programming Language Advocacy (2000)
This is sort of being done right now, as dynamic languages have begun to adopt gradual typing... at least Python and Julia, that I know of.
If something like [JET.jl](https://github.com/aviatesk/JET.jl) become ubiquitous in Julia, one could add a function that pointed out all the places in the code where types are not fully inferred by the compiler.
It'll never be quite the same level of safety as a static language, however.
-
From Julia to Rust
- Pattern matching (sometimes you don't want the overhead of a method lookup)
[1]: https://github.com/aviatesk/JET.jl
-
Julia is the best language to extend Python for scientific computing
You can use the `@code_warntype` macro to check for type stability, which is very helpful for detecting such performance pitfalls on single function level. In the future, https://github.com/aviatesk/JET.jl may give a more powerful way to do it.
- Jet.jl: experimental type checker for Julia
- Jet.jl: A WIP compile time type checker for Julia
What are some alternatives?
julia - The Julia Programming Language
Makie.jl - Interactive data visualizations and plotting in Julia
Enzyme.jl - Julia bindings for the Enzyme automatic differentiator
HTTP.jl - HTTP for Julia
Metatheory.jl - General purpose algebraic metaprogramming and symbolic computation library for the Julia programming language: E-Graphs & equality saturation, term rewriting and more.
FromFile.jl - Julia enhancement proposal (Julep) for implicit per file module in Julia
StaticArrays.jl - Statically sized arrays for Julia
julia-numpy-fortran-test - Comparing Julia vs Numpy vs Fortran for performance and code simplicity
DataFramesMeta.jl - Metaprogramming tools for DataFrames