DOMPurify
marked
DOMPurify | marked | |
---|---|---|
42 | 60 | |
12,802 | 31,926 | |
- | 0.6% | |
8.8 | 9.5 | |
7 days ago | 3 days ago | |
JavaScript | JavaScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
DOMPurify
-
JavaScript Libraries for Implementing Trendy Technologies in Web Apps in 2024
DOMPurify
- Lessons from open-source: Use window.trustedTypes to prevent DOM XSS.
-
Launched my Social Media website for lonely people living abroad, all thanks to NextJS!
I saw that some people were injecting alerts. If you haven't fixed it yet, consider using something like DOMPurify to sanitize the HTML input before posting it to the db.
-
Mastering DOM manipulation with vanilla JavaScript
You mean from this article "Sanitize HTML strings"? https://phuoc.ng/collection/html-dom/sanitize-html-strings/
Yeah, that article really shouldn't imply that sanitization is "that easy". It does at least mention https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify at the end but it should LOUDLY argue against attempting to write this particular thing yourself and promote that exclusively in my opinion.
-
Crafting a Dynamic Blog with Next.js 13 App Directory
It is highly recommended to use an XSS Sanitizer like DOMPurify to sanitize HTML and prevent XSS attacks. For Next.js projects, which prominently feature server-side rendering, Isomorphic DOMPurify is especially valuable. It offers a seamless sanitization process across both server and client, ensuring consistent HTML sanitization in environments like Next.js where a native server-side DOM isn't present.
-
Mitigating DOM clobbering attacks in JavaScript
Note: We’ve used DOMPurify to sanitize the HTML in the above code block. You can install it in Node.js with npm install dompurify. Include it in your HTML with .
-
5 injection vulnerabilities hackers don't want developers to know about (and how to prevent them)
body, input.value property, or body are all different). If you need to insert untrusted input into raw HTML, use a well-tested sanitizer such as DOMPurify.
Setting a strong Content Security Policy without
unsafe-inline
orunsafe-eval
in thescript-src
ordefault-src
directives is an effective defense-in-depth) measure to prevent modern browsers from executing attacker code even if the attacker is able to insert</code> elements into the page.</p> <p><strong>3. HTTP API injection</strong></p> <p>RESTful APIs, GraphQL, and other HTTP-based APIs are ubiquitous. When a web application makes an API call to another service, injection vulnerabilities are possible when that request includes untrusted input.</p> <p>Consider a contrived example in which a web app integrates with a payments service that has a REST API endpoint for creating a subscription: <code>POST /subscriptions/{product_id}?price_usd=<price></code> where <code>price_usd</code> is optional, and a pre-configured price is used if omitted. If an attacker controls the value of <code>product_id</code> and passes a value of <code>desired_product_id?price_id=0</code>, the web app would end up making a request to <code>POST /subscriptions/desired_product_id?price_id=0</code>, which would allow the attacker to sign up for a free subscription.</p> <p>In JavaScript, the standard way to sanitize untrusted inputs in URL paths is <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/encodeURIComponent"><code>encodeURIComponent</code></a>, which replaces problematic characters such as <code>?</code> and <code>/</code> with safe percent-encoded sequences. When inserting untrusted input into URL query parameters, <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/URLSearchParams/URLSearchParams"><code>new URLSearchParams(queryParams)</code></a> provides a convenient, safe interface for building a query string from a JavaScript object of key-value pairs.</p> <p><strong>4. Shell injection</strong></p> <p>Backend APIs sometimes need to execute external commands on the machine where they run. Consider an API that performs <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WHOIS">WHOIS</a> lookups for a requested domain by executing the <code>whois</code> command locally.</p> <p>Consider the following <strong>vulnerable</strong> Node.js code:</p> <pre><code>const whois = child_process.execSync(`whois ${whoisRequest.domain}`); </code></pre> <p>If an attacker can pass the domain <code>reddit.com && rm -rf /</code>, the backend will execute the command <code>whois reddit.com && rm -rf /</code>. The <a href="https://nodejs.org/api/child_process.html#child_processexecsynccommand-options"><code>child_process.execSync</code></a> function passes the command string to the shell (<code>/bin/sh</code> by default on Linux), which parses <code>&& rm -rf /</code> as a subsequent command to wipe the filesystem.</p> <p>To avoid this issue, <strong>never pass untrusted input to a shell</strong>. Instead, use an interface such as <a href="https://nodejs.org/api/child_process.html#child_processexecfilesyncfile-args-options"><code>child_process.execFileSync</code></a> that executes a specific binary (which shouldn't be a shell!) and passes arguments <em>as an array</em>:</p> <pre><code>const whois = child_process.execFileSync("whois", [whoisRequest.domain]); </code></pre> <p>Now, even if the user passes a domain <code>reddit.com && rm -rf /</code>, that entire string will be passed as the command-line argument to <code>whois</code>, which will exit with an error but will not cause any harmful side-effects. Perhaps an even better solution would be to use a library to perform WHOIS queries without needing to execute a separate command.</p> <p>Astute readers may point out that validating the domain against a regex would also likely prevent shell injection in this case. However, avoiding the possibility of shell injection by using a safe interface that keeps untrusted input away from a shell's command parser is a more robust solution that avoids shell injection in all cases.</p> <p><strong>5. Path traversal</strong></p> <p>Finally, a path traversal vulnerability arises when an untrusted input is inserted into a filesystem path, which can cause the wrong file to be read or even written. Consider a backend API that reads a file at the path <code>/teams/${team_id}/${report_name}.csv</code>. If an attacker controls the value of <code>report_name</code> but not <code>team_id</code>, they could pass a <code>report_name</code> of <code>../other_team_id/private.</code> This would cause the file <code>/teams/team_id/../other_team_id/private.csv</code> (resolved to <code>/teams/other_team_id/private.csv</code>) to be read, leaking data from a different team.</p> <p>To avoid path traversal vulnerabilities, <strong>never use untrusted input in file or directory names</strong>. It's safest always to control the names of files and directories, including IDs that you generate and control (e.g., UUIDs, KSUIDs, etc.). If the name of a file or directory absolutely <em>must</em> be derived from untrusted input, consider hashing it (e.g., using SHA-256) or at least encoding it into a format that doesn't include dots or slashes (e.g., <a href="https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4648#section-5">URL-safe base64</a>).</p> <p></p> <p>Know of good Node.js libraries for avoiding injection vulnerabilities? Let folks know in the comments!</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->
-
Is it harder to build and maintain web applications using vanilla js or react?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43584685/input-sanitization-in-reactjs https://www.npmjs.com/package/dompurify
-
Six security risk of user input in ruby code
If you're using an external view engine, or a javascript framework like react in addition to your ruby backend, you can rely on similar sanitization methods like the DOMPurify library.
-
Wat
You shouldn't roll your own for this. From what I've had to do web-wise, here's a few tools.
First, for the APIs, you need documentation: https://swagger.io/
From which you can generate JSON schemas and use those to validate in the browser and on the backend. https://www.npmjs.com/package/jsonschema
As well you should be writing a few more schemas for your application state and leverage the regex validation of your input components...
Speaking of which, you also need to sanitize out some potentially nasty input. https://www.npmjs.com/package/dompurify
Obviously this isn't everything and not perfect, but a lot of this tedium can be automated away if you have a few good examples of the happy path and some basic tests in place to prevent quick and dirty changes from poking holes in these layers.
marked
-
Eleventy vs. Next.js for static site generation
Next, install gray-matter to extract metadata from the front matter of markdown files, and marked to convert the markdown files to HTML:
-
To learn svelte, I clone Github's issues page including useful features that you might consider reusing.
📑 Marked Markdown parser. Use it to create your own markdown editor.
-
🤖 AI Search and Q&A for Your Dev.to Content with Vrite
Vrite SDK provides a few built-in input and output transformers. These are functions, with standardized signatures to process the content from and into Vrite. In this case, gfmInputTransformer is essentially a GitHub Flavored Markdown parser, using Marked.js under the hood.
-
Better code highlighting on the web: rehype-tree-sitter
Another contestant in this realm is Bright[1]. It runs entirely on the server and doesn't increase bundle size as seen here[2]. Regarding parsing speed tree-sitter is without a doubt performant since it is written in Rust, but I don't have any problems "parsing on every keystroke" with a setup containing Marked[3], highlight.js[4] and a sanitizer. I did however experience performance issues with other Markdown parser libraries than Marked.
[1]: https://bright.codehike.org/
[2]: https://aihelperbot.com/test-suite
[3]: https://github.com/markedjs/marked
[4]: https://highlightjs.org/
-
[Project Share] List dialog that supports complex HTML and Markdown format.
The project uses markedJS to convert markdown into HTML, this is their GitHub page.
-
Vrite Editor: Open-Source WYSIWYG Markdown Editor
To handle pasting block Markdown content like this, I had to tap into ProseMirror and implement a custom mechanism (though somewhat based on TipTap’s paste rules), detecting starting and ending points of the blocks and parsing them with Marked.js.
-
Help needed!
I am using marked for markdown parsing together with marked-highlighting to handle syntax highlighting and everything is working as it should.
-
Need help - sanitizeHtml with marked doesn't render special characters correctly (& is &amp; and then &amp;amp)
I'm trying to render user input using SvelteMarkdown (that uses marked).
-
Looking for a Comprehensive Guide for Building Complex Chatbots with GPT-4 API
GPT API returns data in markdown format. You can parse it using a Markdown library and string manipulation. On Electron app I developed https://jhappsproducts.gumroad.com/l/gpteverywhere, I used https://github.com/markedjs/marked and a code syntax highlighting package to display code blocks. And used JavaScript string manipulation to detect when code blocks start and end so I could add COPY/SAVE buttons to the blocks. I hope this helps, and happy coding! :)
-
How I put ChatGPT into a WYSIWYG editor
Again, with streaming enabled, you’ll now receive new tokens as soon as they’re available. Given that OpenAI’s API uses Markdown in its response format, a full message will need to be put together from the incoming tokens and parsed to HTML, as accepted by the replaceContent function. For this purpose, I’ve used the Marked.js parser.
What are some alternatives?
sanitize-html - Clean up user-submitted HTML, preserving whitelisted elements and whitelisted attributes on a per-element basis. Built on htmlparser2 for speed and tolerance
remark - markdown processor powered by plugins part of the @unifiedjs collective
js-xss - Sanitize untrusted HTML (to prevent XSS) with a configuration specified by a Whitelist
markdown-it - Markdown parser, done right. 100% CommonMark support, extensions, syntax plugins & high speed
HtmlSanitizer - Cleans HTML to avoid XSS attacks
snarkdown - :smirk_cat: A snarky 1kb Markdown parser written in JavaScript
xss-filters
MDsveX - A markdown preprocessor for Svelte.
Next.js - The React Framework
js-yaml - JavaScript YAML parser and dumper. Very fast.
isomorphic-dompurify - Use DOMPurify on server and client in the same way
front-matter - Extract YAML front matter from strings