ConcordExtensibilitySamples VS fsharp-companies

The other thing I sometimes miss is debugger support--you can debug through F# code, but any expressions you evaluate via breakpoints or Watch/Quickwatch have to be in C# instead of F#, which is so awkward that it's almost not worth using the debugger ever. I took a stab once at using Concord to write an F# expression evaluator (https://github.com/microsoft/ConcordExtensibilitySamples) but I couldn't make it work in the time I had--I wound up getting lost in the F# compiler service source code.

I've used F# across 3 companies now, only one of which actually advertised that they used F# (as opposed to .NET or C#). Two of them on this list: https://github.com/fsprojects/fsharp-companies

I’ll tell you as someone who learned programming at 12 from library books that it wouldn’t have the effect they think it does. It’s a bit shocking that someone with a professorship has such a loose grasp on things, but F# is not exactly Pyret. There are real companies with actual budgets using F# https://github.com/fsprojects/fsharp-companies

There’s a list of companies that use F# and Microsoft is one of them. Also there are testimonials from Microsoft employees and it looks like it has application in analytical/machine learning scenarios.

Here are a few: https://github.com/Kavignon/fsharp-companies

Adding your company to this list could be also some possible gain.