CheckTestOutput
WireMock.Net
| CheckTestOutput | WireMock.Net | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 0 | 1,302 | |
| - | 2.3% | |
| 4.4 | 8.4 | |
| 9 months ago | 7 days ago | |
| C# | C# | |
| MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
CheckTestOutput
WireMock.Net
-
Mock heavy tests
I'd say that without wanting to refactor the code a little bit (maybe moving those HttpClients into a service so that they are easily mocked) your best bet would be to use something like WireMock or MockHttp.
-
Please recommend a good API Mocking tool
WireMock
-
Usefully links for DotNet Backend Developers
WiremockNet https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net
-
Integration tests without API dependencies with ASP.NET Core and WireMock.Net
In this post, I'll explain how to create mocks for HTTP APIs in narrow integration tests using the WireMock.Net library.
-
Fake apis for testing
Recently was pointed to WireMock for testing purposes.
-
How do you Unit Test a WebAPI? What do you test?
I use WireMock (@ Java) to start a local webserver alongside the tests, this webserver will provide ‘real’ responses to the client. Here’s the C# equivalent: https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net
- Capturing Http requests for testing purposes
-
How do I mock the response from my authentication server for client integration tests?
You could try out WireMock.Net: https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/Using-WireMock-in-UnitTests
-
The only way to go fast, is to go well (TDD from Factorio)
Use WireMock to mock responses from the endpoint that FooClient interacts with. This lets you exercise all of the code contained in FooClient in a realistic way, without using mocks, but still get the different responses you expect.
What are some alternatives?
Fine Code Coverage - Visualize unit test code coverage easily for free in Visual Studio Community Edition (and other editions too)
Moq - Repo for managing Moq 4.x [Moved to: https://github.com/moq/moq]
xUnit - xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for .NET.
mockhttp - Testing layer for Microsoft's HttpClient library. Create canned responses using a fluent API.
xBehave.net - ✖ An xUnit.net extension for describing each step in a test with natural language.
SpecFlow - #1 .NET BDD Framework. SpecFlow automates your testing & works with your existing code. Find Bugs before they happen. Behavior Driven Development helps developers, testers, and business representatives to get a better understanding of their collaboration
NBomber - Modern and flexible load testing framework for Pull and Push scenarios, designed to test any system regardless a protocol (HTTP/WebSockets/AMQP etc) or a semantic model (Pull/Push).
Fluent Assertions - A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.1, .NET Core 3.0, .NET 6, .NET Standard 2.0 and 2.1. Supports the unit test frameworks MSTest2, NUnit3, XUnit2, MSpec, and NSpec3.
FsCheck - Random Testing for .NET
dotnet-testcontainers - 🐋 A library to support tests with throwaway instances of Docker containers for all compatible .NET Standard versions. [Moved to: https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-dotnet]