svelte-headlessui VS star-history

Hi everyone, I'm so happy I can finally share the project I've been working on for the past few months. Ato UI is a themeable component UI library built with UnoCSS (with the Tailwind + Windi preset) and offers both styled and headless components, since the library is build on top of other fantastic headless libraries like Headless UI and Grail UI. Skeleton was also a big inspiration, as you'll be able to see in the designer page and the token system.

You mention YAGNI, but I think the bigger blocker is "Don't reinvent the wheel" - which I think is the most misunderstood bit of programming advice out there. In my SvelteKit app, I am not using a "UI Framework" that provides components to me. I don't need to. Svelte is simple enough that I can build almost anything myself. I've looked at Skeleton's source code, and their components on average are not better than versions I have rolled myself. There are a few cases where it's better to use a framework. Sliders, for instance, have a lot of edge cases. So I use Swiper for carousels. But even then, I could build a working basic slider (that doesn't address the numerous edge cases) myself in an hour. The other case is Headless UI but even there, I disagree with how he implemented some things and it's possible to roll your own Svelte Headless UI just from Tailwind's source.

I've been using https://github.com/captaincodeman/svelte-headlessui/ since previous with react I was using headlessui w/ tailwid.

I've also seen this alternative library utilising svelte use:action directive rather than components.

That’s a great project you pulled off. From the time I starred it (10-12h ago I think), and upon re-checking this post, you gained 500+ stars lol.

Visualized in a chart with star-history: https://star-history.com/#nilsherzig/LLocalSearch

You can actively see a fresh "hype curve" in the transformer-debugger repo that was posted a couple days ago (https://github.com/openai/transformer-debugger) (star history https://star-history.com/#openai/transformer-debugger&Date).

Regardless of the repo's stars or how valuable it really is, at the time I saw it posted to HN, it had 1.6k stars/16 hours. What channel are people listening to to star it so quickly. I'm not implying any nefariousness, mind you, I'm only wondering where all the stargazers were referred from so fast and in such volume.

I’ve been releasing open-source projects for years now, and I’ve always wanted to see how fast my Github repo is growing compared to other successful repositories on https://star-history.com/. The problem is that on Star History, I’m unable to zoom into the graph, so a new repo that has 1,000 stars cannot be compared with a big repo that has 50,000 because you can’t see how the bigger repo does in its beginning. So, I asked GPT Pilot to build this functionality. It scrapes Github repos for stargazers, saves them into the database, plots them on a graph, and enables the graph to be zoomed in and out.

i'm a one man shop in montana, competing w/ Google, Vercel & Facebook for dev mindshare

if i did what everyone else does you never would have heard of htmx

https://star-history.com/#bigskysoftware/htmx&Date

also: https://star-history.com/#bigskysoftware/htmx&facebook/react...

Similar to http://star-history.com for GitHub repos, http://like-history.ai is a tool to help generate the like history of projects on HuggingFace.co

More details: https://twitter.com/Tim_Qian/status/1730245069259575485

yeah, he was the one that really started the madness:

https://star-history.com/#bigskysoftware/htmx&bigskysoftware...

his video posted on july 7th

Github star history graph of the batch:

https://star-history.com/#trpc/trpc&termux/termux-app&respon...