CSharpFunctionalExtensions
Functional extensions for C# (by vkhorikov)
OneOf
Easy to use F#-like ~discriminated~ unions for C# with exhaustive compile time matching (by mcintyre321)
| CSharpFunctionalExtensions | OneOf | |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | 25 | |
| 2,245 | 3,225 | |
| - | - | |
| 6.4 | 2.9 | |
| 6 days ago | 3 months ago | |
| C# | C# | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
CSharpFunctionalExtensions
Posts with mentions or reviews of CSharpFunctionalExtensions.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-07-07.
-
Result pattern: language-ext vs FunctionalExtensions?
Hey, I am considering adopting the Result pattern in my codebase. Wanted to get some opinions from someone who has experience with it: should I start with language-ext or FunctionalExtensions?
-
Exception handling between controller and service
I like both of those libraries but my favorite is CSharpFunctionalExtensions.
-
Do you add the “Async” suffix to async method names?
This very popular library CSharpFunctionalExtensions does not add the “Async” suffix because:
- Is it better to return null or a new object?
-
Communication - library for Results
Something that also has types to handle such cases is https://github.com/vkhorikov/CSharpFunctionalExtensions
-
Three words.,, => C# Functional Programming is awesome!!! Do you seasoned developers have any war-stories or nightmare stories regarding Functional Programming?
CSharpFunctionalExtensions Really great, this is all you need
-
MVC: How do you return Failures from Services? (Separation of Concern)
https://github.com/vkhorikov/CSharpFunctionalExtensions is a small library that has a really nice Result type included, which allows implicit converisons.
-
Kentico Xperience Design Patterns: Handling Failures - The Result Monad
If you think your Kentico Xperience site might benefit from returning failures and using the Result monad, checkout the CSharpFunctionalExtensions library and my library-in-progress XperienceCommunity.CQRS. It codifies these patterns for data retrieval and integrates cross-cutting concerns like logging and caching.
- What's a pattern similar to Rust's Option<Option<T>>?
-
Only continue with functions if variable is true
https://github.com/vkhorikov/CSharpFunctionalExtensions - a package with ready types and functions :)
OneOf
Posts with mentions or reviews of OneOf.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-27.
-
The Monad Invasion - Part 1: What's a Monad?
OneOf
-
Discriminated Unions: Essa feature faz falta no CSharp
Inclusive, para suportar esse tipo de funcionalidade, foi criada a biblioteca OneOf: mcintyre321/OneOf: Easy to use F#-like ~discriminated~ unions for C# with exhaustive compile time matching (github.com)
- Easy to use F#-like ~discriminated~ unions for C# with big compile time matching
-
Rolled my own Result<T,E> type that seems to work better than others.
Then I found discussion of the OneOf package, and then found some simpler Result code. I tried using that code but I found the use of Match and lambdas meant I couldn't simply break out of the loop in my example.
-
What's new in C# 12: overview
Until that feature lands there's this https://github.com/mcintyre321/OneOf which is pretty nice.
- The combined power of F# and C#
-
Exception handling between controller and service
Yep, it's called result pattern, aforementioned above. There was two highlighted implementations - OneOf, FluentResults.
-
Have you heard of AnyOf .NET Lib?
No he didn't. He made a video of the OneOf library. Not this one.
-
Have you heard of AnyOf C# Library?
We already have OneOf https://github.com/mcintyre321/OneOf I've used it in Production multiple times and it's an awesome way to keep everything strongly typed and eliminate null reference exceptions.
- What your hidden nuget gems ?
What are some alternatives?
When comparing CSharpFunctionalExtensions and OneOf you can also consider the following projects:
language-ext - C# functional language extensions - a base class library for functional programming
docs - User documentation for Knative components.
csharp-monad - Library of monads for C#
docs - This repository contains .NET Documentation.
ValueOf - Deal with Primitive Obsession - define ValueObjects in a single line (of C#).
github-docs - The open-source repo for docs.github.com
csharplang - The official repo for the design of the C# programming language
FluentResults - A generalised Result object implementation for .NET/C#
Rop.OneOfExtensionGenerator - OneOf Helper Extensions Source Generator
ASP.NET Core - ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.
TensorFlowSharp - TensorFlow API for .NET languages
CSharpFunctionalExtensions vs language-ext
OneOf vs language-ext
CSharpFunctionalExtensions vs docs
OneOf vs csharp-monad
CSharpFunctionalExtensions vs docs
OneOf vs ValueOf
CSharpFunctionalExtensions vs github-docs
OneOf vs csharplang
CSharpFunctionalExtensions vs FluentResults
OneOf vs Rop.OneOfExtensionGenerator
CSharpFunctionalExtensions vs ASP.NET Core
OneOf vs TensorFlowSharp