CGrpFS VS aurora

Compare CGrpFS vs aurora and see what are their differences.

CGrpFS

Tiny implementation of the GNU/Linux CGroupFS (sans resource controllers) as a PUFFS or FUSE filesystem for BSD platforms (by InitWare)
cgroups puffs Netbsd Fuse fuse-filesystem Filesystem Bsd Linux Openbsd Freebsd dragonflybsd Compatibility
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

aurora

Aurora Single Level Store (by rcslab)
Filesystem Freebsd operating-systems Storage
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
CGrpFS aurora
2 1
13 21
- -
4.5 7.1
over 2 years ago about 2 months ago
C C
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

CGrpFS

Posts with mentions or reviews of CGrpFS. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

aurora

Posts with mentions or reviews of aurora. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-03-30.
  • Seeking feedback on my hobby OS project: MemOS
    3 projects | /r/osdev | 30 Mar 2023
    As an example on how to persist Linux/Unix processes check out the Aurora single level store that extends FreeBSD (we also have a paper that outlines the main problems and provides an explanation of the design). Aurora expands an existing OS and prioritizes supporting Unix applications so it looks very different from the microkernel design you are going for, but the problems it solves are intrinsic to making applications persistent.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing CGrpFS and aurora you can also consider the following projects:

exfat - Free exFAT file system implementation

KeyKOS - Source code of the KeyKOS operating system

netbsd_hammer2 - HAMMER2 file system for NetBSD

minixfromscratch - Development and compilation setup for the book versions of MINIX (2.0.0 and 3.1.0) on QEMU

pcloud-console-client - A simple console client for pCloud cloud storage.

freebsd_hammer2 - HAMMER2 file system for FreeBSD

GlusterFS - Gluster Filesystem : Build your distributed storage in minutes

openbsd_hammer2 - HAMMER2 file system for OpenBSD

capros - CapROS is an experimental operating system based on object-capabilities, derived from EROS, KeyKOS, and Gnosis. Ports exist for the Intel IA-32 and ARM9 architectures.

cpdup - Filesystem mirroring utility from DragonFly BSD

MooseFS - MooseFS – Open Source, Petabyte, Fault-Tolerant, Highly Performing, Scalable Network Distributed File System (Software-Defined Storage)

CGrpFS vs exfat aurora vs KeyKOS CGrpFS vs netbsd_hammer2 aurora vs minixfromscratch CGrpFS vs pcloud-console-client aurora vs freebsd_hammer2 CGrpFS vs freebsd_hammer2 aurora vs GlusterFS CGrpFS vs openbsd_hammer2 aurora vs capros CGrpFS vs cpdup aurora vs MooseFS