Blazor.WebRTC
CodeBehind Framework
Blazor.WebRTC | CodeBehind Framework | |
---|---|---|
1 | 38 | |
37 | 32 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 9.7 | |
about 2 years ago | 24 days ago | |
C# | C# | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Blazor.WebRTC
CodeBehind Framework
-
Elanat CMS 2.2 Gives New Meaning to Modularity.
Elanat CMS is a large and powerful content management system based on ASP.NET Core. Elanat CMS is a CMS-Framework that does not use any of the default ASP.NET Core frameworks (Razor Pages, MVC, Blazor). Elanat CMS is built under CodeBehind Framework. Elanat CMS and CodeBehind Framework both belong to Elanat team.
-
How to Load Controller Class From Another DLL?
When the modular name comes in ASP.NET Core, we have to use the CodeBehind framework. If you think the default MVC in ASP.NET Core has this modular feature, please leave a comment in the comments section.
-
Elanat Competes with Microsoft; CodeBehind 2.4 Released
About 8 months have passed since the birth of the CodeBehind framework. In these 8 months, we have released 29 new versions with revolutionary innovations, performance improvements and new features; we have now released version 2.4; CodeBehind framework version 2.4 is the 30th version of this framework.
-
How to Send Data to the Server
In this article, we want to teach you how to submit form data in the CodeBehind framework. To keep it simple, we just added a View page with a Controller class and didn't use a Model.
-
ASP.NET Core MVC vs Razor Pages, Which is Faster? CodeBehind!
CodeBehind Website
-
Disadvantages of MVC Architecture in ASP.NET Core
In this article, we discuss the disadvantages of MVC architecture in ASP.NET Core; at the same time, we compare the wonderful architecture of the CodeBehind framework with ASP.NET Core. For each disadvantage of MVC in ASP.NET Core, we will give an example and we will also add the corresponding example with the CodeBehind framework.
-
CodeBehind 2.1; aspx Back to ASP.NET Core
By studying the CodeBehind framework GitHub repository, you can get enough information about the structure of this framework and compare it with ASP.NET Core.
-
How to Use a Ready-Made Website in Back-End Framework
In this article, we want to teach you how to put these static templates into the powerful CodeBehind framework and make them dynamic.
- New Csharp Back-End Framework – Alternative to Asp.net Core
-
How to Build a Modular System Using ASP.NET Core?
We first explain the concept of a module, then teach how to create a module in a project built using the CodeBehind framework.
What are some alternatives?
ASP.NET Core - ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.
Elanat - Elanat is ASP.NET Core CMS. Elanat is add-on oriented framework. The Elanat kernel is designed to create an add-on for it as easily as possible; the Elanat kernel contains a variety of add-ons; the structure of Elanat allows the programmer to create a new web system containing different types of add-ons.
interface-types
Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails
SailsJS - Realtime MVC Framework for Node.js
Spring Boot - Spring Boot
CakePHP - CakePHP: The Rapid Development Framework for PHP - Official Repository
Nest - A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient, scalable, and enterprise-grade server-side applications with TypeScript/JavaScript 🚀
Laravel - Laravel is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. We’ve already laid the foundation for your next big idea — freeing you to create without sweating the small things.
Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.