BetterMeet
workgroup
| BetterMeet | workgroup | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 5 | 47 | |
| - | - | |
| 2.6 | 0.0 | |
| 7 months ago | 10 months ago | |
| JavaScript | Go | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
BetterMeet
-
Live Coding - Building a Community Website with Next.JS & React, Pt. 7
This session will be dedicated to the planning of the upcoming community platform BetterMeet.net (similar to meetup.com) More details can be found at https://github.com/freewarelovers/BetterMeet (please STAR IT)
workgroup
-
Gworker, the most easily configurable Generic worker pool implementation
I still think my worker pool is the best: https://github.com/carlmjohnson/workgroup
- A lot of boilerplate code when writing asynchronous code in go
- Workgroup: An easy to use concurrent task manager
-
Implementing Thread/Worker pool using Go generics
I have one that I’ve been using for a while and just updated to use Go 1.20 multierrors: https://github.com/carlmjohnson/workgroup
-
How idiomatic is this?
Read https://blog.carlmjohnson.net/post/share-memory-by-communicating/ and look at the code in https://github.com/carlmjohnson/workgroup for reference.
-
How are YOU using generics so far?
So far, just refactoring. I made a concurrency manager to simplify some stuff, and unified some pagination code. It’s like we said before generics: there are places you miss it, but not having it was never a total blocker. I think going working the x/slices x/maps packages will be the biggest time savers.
-
Go, Generics, and Concurrency
Yeah, I wrote my own generic concurrency thing, and it has two functions. There's a high level Process(nWorkers, task, manager, initial) and a lower level Start(nWorkers, task) (in chan<- Input, out <-chan Result[Input, Output]). The high level function is built off of the low level one and just queues jobs for the task workers by giving job results to the manager to see if it produces any more work. Context isn't involved in either because the idea is that the tasks should have their own internal contexts. You don't want to cancel the task runner, you want to cancel the tasks!
What are some alternatives?
hackclub - 🌎 Hack Club is a worldwide community of high school hackers. We make things. We help one another. We have fun.
warg - Declarative and Intuitive Command Line Apps with Go
WorkGroup - Self-Hosted private Social Media-Intranet for Companies.
next-pwa - Zero config PWA plugin for Next.js, with workbox 🧰 with appDir support
RC4Community - Full-stack components for building, engaging, and growing your massive on-line community
watchman - AML/CTF/KYC/OFAC Search of global watchlist and sanctions
projetos-iniciantes - Lista de projetos de baixa complexidade para pessoas iniciantes participarem da Hacktoberfest
golpo - Social network using react and express (old version of the current golpo.dedsec.life)
elegalio-template - Responsive and modern website template, made with React.
fokus - react web app to help you become more productive :fire: and efficient with time:star2:
golang-generics-dao-example - Example using Generics with DAO
tinykv - tiny in-memory single-app kv (cache) with explicit and sliding expiration