why3
acsl-by-example
why3 | acsl-by-example | |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 | |
27 | 94 | |
- | - | |
9.5 | 1.8 | |
26 days ago | almost 3 years ago | |
OCaml | TeX | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
why3
-
Why the C Language Will Never Stop You from Making Mistakes
With Frama-C you can prove doubly linked lists and all manner of complicated pointer manipulating graph algorithms. It does not impose a Rust-like pointer ownership policy as does SPARK.
However, for embedded development, SPARK's restrictions are a good trade-off, as the more restrictive rules allow more proofs to be fully automated than with Frama-C and simplify diagnostic messages. A fly-by-wire avionics computer doesn't need to dynamically allocate a billion graph nodes. But SPARK is not "general purpose" like C with Frama-C is.
AdaCore's SPARK tool stack is not actually written in SPARK as far as I can see, much of it is actually OCaml and Coq/Gallina for the Why3 component also used by Frama-C. See all the .ml OCaml and .v Gallina source code for yourself:
https://github.com/AdaCore/why3
And of course the compiler backend for Ada/SPARK is GNU GCC, written in unverified C:
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/tree/master/gcc/config
Compare with CompCert, the formally verified C compiler:
https://github.com/AbsInt/CompCert
Frama-C unfortunately requires a user to be mathematician-logician logic programming expert to fully utilize. One can begin training in Coq/Gallina with the large free online Software Foundations course:
https://softwarefoundations.cis.upenn.edu/
acsl-by-example
-
Why the C Language Will Never Stop You from Making Mistakes
Yes, Frama-C uses a plugin architecture, and there are plugins to verify all kinds of things, including functional correctness. The Frama-C tutorials page,
https://frama-c.com/html/tutorials.html
Has a link to the ACSL-by-example PDF which gives examples of creating in C various C++ STL inspired data structures and routines:
https://github.com/fraunhoferfokus/acsl-by-example/blob/mast...
Also, it is less effort to write bug-free code in OCaml than C. The Coq/Gallina proof assistant even has an OCaml-extraction (and also Haskell-extraction) feature where you extract runnable code from a formally verified algorithm in the Gallina specification language. (It's generally easier to proof theorems about code in the theorem prover itself, go figure.) Most of these C verification tools are written in OCaml, not C, with varying levels of assistance from Coq/Gallina.
The main reason the functional languages make it easier is because you generally execute side-effect free functions on data structures to give them the mathematical property you want. For example, you execute a lexicographical sort function on a list of strings and then the strings in the list all satisfy the mathematical property of a total ordering. You don't have to do any reasoning about the "in-between state" where pointers under the hood are being manipulated, and you don't have to add pre-conditions and post-conditions about the global environment if the code is side effect free and does not access non-local memory.
What are some alternatives?
CompCert - The CompCert formally-verified C compiler
sol2 - Sol3 (sol2 v3.0) - a C++ <-> Lua API wrapper with advanced features and top notch performance - is here, and it's great! Documentation:
hacl-star - HACL*, a formally verified cryptographic library written in F*
gcc
RecordFlux - Formal specification and generation of verifiable binary parsers, message generators and protocol state machines
spark-by-example - SPARK by Example is an adaptation of ACSL by Example for SPARK 2014, a programming language which is a formally verified subset of Ada