American Fuzzy Lop VS gui_starter_template

There's some efforts to guide test generation for property based testing to make the instruction pointer explore as large a space as possible.

This effort is more mature in the fuzzing community. See eg American Fuzzy Lop https://github.com/google/AFL

What you're describing, just generating random input to test a program, is sometimes called "blind fuzzing" but the state-of-the-art is far beyond that. Maybe try reading through the documentation of e.g. https://github.com/google/AFL to see what a fuzzer does and why just producing random input isn't even scratching the surface.

for general riscv I used to use this https://github.com/google/AFL I dont know if it supports x64 tho.

Ex ( AFL, WinAFL, HonggFuzz, LibFuzzer, Jazzer )

I wrote this little fuzz test target in order to fuzz it with afl (under ASan and UBSan):

afl, which is trivial to apply to this program:

I made my own version of a TCL interpreter (well, a very TCL like langauge) derived from "picol" available at https://github.com/howerj/pickle. There are many different re-implementations and derivatives of this interpreter but they all seem very "crashy", this one has been significantly hardened by using a fuzzer on it which ran for months called American Fuzzy Lop https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/ . It is also more suitable for embedded use whilst still not having arbitrary restrictions like many other implementations.

On Linux afl is a very powerful bug-finding tool, and it's a great companion when doing code review. Composes well with ASan and UBSan.

b-, https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/

Was checking that as well, can't find it indeed. I would recommend looking into the following: https://github.com/cpp-best-practices/gui_starter_template

gui_starter_template. This is a C++ Best Practices GitHub template for getting up and running with C++ quickly.

Next to language versions, spend time setting up your build system (CMake?) with all bells and whistles. You want unit tests, clang-tidy, include-what-you-use, sanitizers, fuzzing, clang-format, package managers. Just take a look at https://github.com/cpp-best-practices/gui_starter_template

https://github.com/cpp-best-practices/gui_starter_template from Jason Turner (aka lefticus) is quite a popular one (2.1k stars in Github)

I actually just tried to play around with what seems to be a "modern c++" boilerplate project.

It uses CMake, conan for packaging, clang-tidy and cpp-check, and has templates for fuzz and unit testing[1].

I found it because qtcreator and kdevelop were weirdly clunky and created partly broken qt projects and I figured I wanted to add a package manager and qt to the mix.

The template looks really fancy, but it's so incredibly slow, to the point of being unusable.

It's a ramble yes. But the point is modern C++ tools seem to have added some niceties to the language, but they also brought more of the main C++ issues, i.e. slow compile times and nasty boilerplate in the build process. Yes, I realize CMake isn't modern and there are a bunch of new build tools.

[1] https://github.com/cpp-best-practices/gui_starter_template

Clang-tidy file of the C++ Project Template

For cmake i find this useful: https://cliutils.gitlab.io/modern-cmake/ https://github.com/cpp-best-practices/gui_starter_template

Jason Turner (known from cppcast) has following project: https://github.com/cpp-best-practices/cpp_starter_project

this is a cpp_question, but anyway, I think this is exactly what you're looking for. Credits go to Jason Turner.