Windmill-gh-action-deploy Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to windmill-gh-action-deploy
-
oil
Oils is our upgrade path from bash to a better language and runtime. It's also for Python and JavaScript users who avoid shell!
-
sso-wall-of-shame
A list of vendors that treat single sign-on as a luxury feature, not a core security requirement.
-
SurveyJS
Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App. With SurveyJS form UI libraries, you can build and style forms in a fully-integrated drag & drop form builder, render them in your JS app, and store form submission data in any backend, inc. PHP, ASP.NET Core, and Node.js.
-
windmill
Open-source developer platform to turn scripts into workflows and UIs. Fastest workflow engine (5x vs Airflow). Open-source alternative to Airplane and Retool.
-
-
jackson
🔥 Streamline your web application's authentication with Jackson, an SSO service supporting SAML and OpenID Connect protocols. Beyond enterprise-grade Single Sign-On, it also supports Directory Sync via the SCIM 2.0 protocol for automatic user and group provisioning/de-provisioning. 🤩 (by boxyhq)
-
windmill-gh-action-deploy reviews and mentions
-
Launch HN: Windmill (YC S22) – Turn scripts into internal apps and workflows
> Ability to store everything in code that you control. In Airplane, we have a CLI that lets you deploy scripts from your own machine to Airplane. You can version control the script code as well as the metadata (name, parameters, validation rules, etc). In Windmill you have to create everything in their UI as far as I can tell. Airplane's approach is more developer-friendly and also allows you to reference other code in your codebase if you want.
https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill-gh-action-deploy Which is basically just sending a tar of your repo to sync it so you do not have to centralize your code on Windmill if you do not have to.
What about the features you do not provide, like a fully-featured web editor with lsp in the backend for smart assistant. The ability to convert script parameters to UI directly and so on.
> * Third-party integrations (Sendgrid, Slack, etc). I only saw Slack in your docs.
This is disingenuous, we provide integrations for anything that has OAuth https://docs.windmill.dev/docs/contributors_guide#add-an-oau... by just needing to append the oauth informations to this file: https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill/blob/main/backend/.... We have a hub for people to provide the no-code module part out of it. We expect this ways to have thousands of integrations by the end of this quarter when you will only have a dozen.
You have an amazing product but being open-source is not our sole differentiator, we want to build an even better amazing product.
-
No-code is the future of programming. That's great news for engineers
Yes you can, and you should! The included versioning is there for simplicity if you do not want the hassle to maintain your own git repo. But the real git will always be more powerful.
There is a github action to automatically deploy from github to windmill: https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill-gh-action-deploy
That gh action is what I do for the public templates that hydrate every workspace on:
https://github.com/windmill-labs/windmill
Fun fact, the way it works is that it just tarball a subdir of your repo and send it as an input of a normal windmill script that then just extract it to your workspace (for all the diffs that it finds).
Stats
windmill-labs/windmill-gh-action-deploy is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of windmill-gh-action-deploy is TypeScript.
Popular Comparisons
Sponsored