Rfcs Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to rfcs

v

219 35,272 9.9 V rfcs VS v

Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software. Compiles itself in <1s with zero library dependencies. Supports automatic C => V translation. https://vlang.io
v-mode

89 57 0.0 Emacs Lisp rfcs VS v-mode

🌻 An Emacs major mode for the V programming language.
WorkOS

workos.com sponsored

The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
gitly

2 1,288 7.2 V rfcs VS gitly

Light and fast GitHub/GitLab alternative written in V

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better rfcs alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to rfcs

rfcs reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of rfcs. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-09-28.

? vs !
2 projects | /r/vlang | 28 Sep 2022
V 0.3
20 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 1 Jul 2022

Are there plans for docs to be updated? The 0.3 release notes claim:
> Option and Result are now separate types: ?Foo and !Foo respectively. Old code will continue working for 1 year and will result in a warning/hint.
Yet, doc/docs.md still state:
> V combines Option and Result into one type, so you don't need to decide which one to use.
Is there an up-to-date doc, or how does one find out more about these types? I found parts of the RFC overhauling the error handling [0] pretty bizarre, so I'm interested to see how the implementation turned out.
[0]: https://github.com/vlang/rfcs/pull/24