Starkex-contracts Alternatives

starkex-contracts reviews and mentions

• Open-Sourcing the Starknet Prover
  1 project | /r/ethereum | 6 Feb 2023

  Technically speaking, for safety, they only need to opensource the algorithm and the verifier (not the prover), which I think was always opensource (though starkware's public repos are a mess, I'm not sure if this is exactly the same as the StarkNet's one)

• REQUEST TO UPDATE EXTERNAL SECURITY AUDITS FOR DYDX
  1 project | /r/dydx | 16 Nov 2022

  Now, I wonder if it is possible to 1) Update external security audits for DYDX, because the audit for layer 1 https://blog.openzeppelin.com/dydx-perpetual-audit/ is very old from 04/14/2020 ? 2) this audit states for Layer 1 Administrators very extensive rights, like "Perpetual has a privileged admin role that can make arbitrary changes to the market contract, set critical market parameters, set the price oracle, and enable final settlement. The admin can also add/remove global operators, which have the ability to make arbitrary trades on behalf of all users. These privileges would allow a malicious or compromised admin and/or global operator to trivially steal funds from the market." This is very different to your website that states way less privileges: "Many protocols have an administrative account that can add or remove features from the protocol. In our case, the account can add new markets, change interest rate functions, or set new oracles for prices. " at https://help.dydx.exchange/en/articles/2906504-how-can-i-trust-that-my-funds-are-safe Even though admins are now using multisig addresses, can you please state how many admins must sign on a blockchain for a change/overwrite of any function in DyDx and who this admins are at all times (current list)? 3) The smart contracts, like your website states are audited by Peckshield. The Audit https://github.com/starkware-libs/starkex-contracts/blob/master/audit/StarkPerpetual_v1.0_Audit_Report.pdf is written, audited and approved by ONE Person only. > Time to update security?

• Is $UXD a scam?
  1 project | /r/CryptoScamReport | 6 Feb 2022

  The project page also leads us to audit pdf file. Let's have a look (https://bramah.systems/audits/UXD\_Audit\_Bramah.pdf ) There is blah-blah-blah and typographic error in the comments. And that's all. For a project of that size, I think, it should look differently. Let's look at who also was audited by Bramah. Dydx exchange? Looks promising. But no mention of the Bramah audit on Dydx page. But there is an audit from PeckShield (https://github.com/starkware-libs/starkex-contracts/blob/master/audit/StarkEx\_v1.0\_Audit\_Report.pdf). You can have a look how a proper audit looks like and how it differs from UXD one.

• Daily General Discussion - September 16, 2021
  4 projects | /r/ethfinance | 15 Sep 2021

  You can see the contract which allows for this `-Withdrawal` operation on Github here

• GU cards minted on IMX are not ERC-721 NFTs
  2 projects | /r/GodsUnchained | 13 Apr 2021

  You can see the contract which allows for this `FullWithdrawal` operation on Github here (I provided the contracts above but Etherscan write doesn't play nicely with layered Proxies).

• A note from our sponsor - WorkOS
  workos.com | 26 Apr 2024

  The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning. Learn more →