Quid-pro-quo Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to quid-pro-quo

coalton

84 990 8.4 Common Lisp quid-pro-quo VS coalton

Coalton is an efficient, statically typed functional programming language that supercharges Common Lisp.
mgl-pax

5 68 8.8 Common Lisp quid-pro-quo VS mgl-pax

Documentation system, browser, generator.
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com sponsored

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
liz

4 249 0.0 Clojure quid-pro-quo VS liz

Lisp-flavored general-purpose programming language (based on Zig)
rutils

2 245 0.0 Common Lisp quid-pro-quo VS rutils

Radical Utilities for Common Lisp
slow-jam

1 30 10.0 Common Lisp quid-pro-quo VS slow-jam

Common Lisp lazy sequence library
hamt-rs

1 171 0.0 Rust quid-pro-quo VS hamt-rs

Discontinued A Persistent Map Implementation based on Hash Array Mapped Tries
picl

1 15 10.0 Common Lisp quid-pro-quo VS picl
WorkOS

workos.com sponsored

The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better quid-pro-quo alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to quid-pro-quo

quid-pro-quo reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of quid-pro-quo. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-04-04.

What is a feature of other languages that you miss in Lisp?
6 projects | /r/lisp | 4 Apr 2022

Here's a Lisp library for contracts: https://github.com/sellout/quid-pro-quo (not saying this is what ADA has ..)
Lisp is Not an Acceptable Lisp
3 projects | /r/programming | 7 Jan 2021

These are just his opinions. Many people really enjoy CLOS, and closer-mop provides better compatibility across implementations. Hygienic macros can be cool (like Racket's) but ultimately I'd consider them a preference. defmacro and gensym are more than fine. CL's type system is quite flexible, and there's stuff like defstar for better function signatures and quid-pro-quo for contract programming (which can actually solve the heading numbering problem). Multimethods are awesome. If you want an ML/Hindley-Milner type system then you should probably be using a different language anyway.