ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG21 paper scheduling and management (by cplusplus)

Papers Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to papers

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better papers alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to papers

Reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of papers. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-21.
  • Some lesser-known powers of std::optional | 2021-10-06
    I think a monadic interface for optional did just get voted into C++23 though:
  • Are Metaclasses still coming to C++? | 2021-09-21
    I don't know about Herb, but it wasn't dropped or anything.
  • WG21, aka C++ Standard Committee, September 2021 Mailing | 2021-09-20
    Most of the details can be found here and in the linked papers:
  • Is it valid to cast a pointer of T to a pointer of U?
    Pedantry warning: Currently there's a bug in the specification of the language. A T* can be cast to char*, but that char* can not be incremented to "iterate" over the bytes that the T consists of. This is definitely not intended and I wouldn't worry about that, but... and
  • What happened to "P1251 A more constexpr bitset"? | 2021-09-13
  • Is writing higher order memoize function for recursive (pure) function not possible with C++ lambdas (also without using type erasure) | 2021-08-31
    Feeling a bit too tired to read the paper, but I think would allow this kind of thing without std::function.
  • Why isn't there a vector, which allocates its data on the stack? (stay with me, please!)
    Because it hasnt made it through (yet): . Presumably the overall demand/push for it hasnt been (deemed) large enough to justify serious consideration (judging by just "in favour" votes).
  • char8_t, UTF-8, and planning for the future of C++
    That would be hasty busywork. The only thing char8_t and u8"asd" currently provide is making it hard for you to input non-UTF-8 data. If you want to use non-UTF-8 data in a UTF-8 literal, you'll have to use \xXY to specify bytes. I just wouldn't worry about any of this until P1729 progresses further.
  • Status of proposals | 2021-06-24
  • Why isn’t new (int*)[10] fine, but new int*[10] is fine?
  • Trip report: Summer 2021 ISO C++ standards meeting (virtual) | 2021-06-10
    You can get a rough idea by looking at the corresponding github issue.
  • ELI5: Folly - Battle-Tested C++ Library | 2021-05-25
    std::move_only_function could end up in C++23.
  • "Should we break the ABI" is the wrong question | 2021-05-04
    There's a proposal for that. Check out
  • Thoughts on adding 'libraries' as a language concept | 2021-05-02
  • WG21, aka C++ Standard Committee, April 2021 Mailing | 2021-04-24
    In the past I would argue that we shouldn't bring this up at all, since the committee has problems prioritizing... things..., any little suggestion apparently can delay entire features by years, edging on decades, but it looks like we aren't going to get networking, reflection, or meta classes until c++29 anyway, so I guess there's actually no issue this time updating issues and bringing these things to light.


Basic papers repo stats
about 1 month ago
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

Popular Comparisons

Find remote jobs at our new job board
There are 34 new remote jobs listed recently.
Are you hiring? Post a new remote job listing for free.