Sc Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to sc

caniuse

388 5,499 9.5 JavaScript sc VS caniuse

Raw browser/feature support data from caniuse.com
WHATWG HTML Standard

137 7,695 9.4 HTML sc VS WHATWG HTML Standard

HTML Standard
InfluxDB

www.influxdata.com sponsored

Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
csswg-drafts

70 4,269 9.9 Bikeshed sc VS csswg-drafts

CSS Working Group Editor Drafts
stylelint

44 10,821 9.6 JavaScript sc VS stylelint

A mighty CSS linter that helps you avoid errors and enforce conventions.
SSMLParser

9 33 10.0 JavaScript sc VS SSMLParser

Implement SSML parsing for Web Speech API
Cassius

5 90 0.0 Racket sc VS Cassius

A CSS specification and reasoning engine

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better sc alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to sc

sc reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of sc. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-12-19.

W3C’s transfer from MIT to non-profit going poorly
6 projects | /r/programming | 19 Dec 2022

Do we need W3C anymore? The HTML 5 specification has been created by WHATWG for many years now, with W3C only rubber-stamping historic WHATWG versions until 2017 or so. SVG2 is going nowhere, and so isn't MathML, leaving the CSS working group as W3C's remaining point of influence over the Web. CSS is regarded as so poor and overdone a specification that the only two external projects for a formal specification have failed or remained woefully incomplete (1, 2).
Is There Too Much CSS Now?
4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Nov 2022

1. CSS should've been split into app-y styles and doc-y styles a looong time ago; meaning that when you need JavaScript to make use of a feature anyway, there's no point in using CSS and it's better to set styles, layout using JavaScript rather than bloat CSS. The Houdini API was on the right track years ago.
2. The CSS WG at W3C must deliver formal specification rather than the prose they're writing up now. For an idea how a (partial) formal spec for CSS rendering looks like, see eg. [1], [2] (with limitations).
The one way complexity that both W3C and WHATWG have delivered over the past 15 years with complete lack of mental discipline due to financial dependency/job security will be a major source of confusion for generations to cone, and will not be looked at favorably.
[1]: https://github.com/uwplse/cassius
[2]: https://github.com/lmeyerov/sc