Import-cost.nvim Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to import-cost.nvim
-
-
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
-
-
-
-
-
packer.nvim
A use-package inspired plugin manager for Neovim. Uses native packages, supports Luarocks dependencies, written in Lua, allows for expressive config
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
NOTE:
The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives.
Hence, a higher number means a better import-cost.nvim alternative or higher similarity.
import-cost.nvim discussion
import-cost.nvim reviews and mentions
Posts with mentions or reviews of import-cost.nvim.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-03.
-
Bot Testing
Sample repo: https://github.com/barrett-ruth/import-cost.nvim/
-
import-cost.nvim: import costs finally to neovim!
If you search a package on bundlephobia you get the size of the entire package (see here). However, the entire react module doesn't get bundled and shipped to the client - only what you use does. That's why the npm module, using webpack, can get you more accurate sizes. If you look at import-cost.nvim, the front preview displays this fact: different import statements yield different code bundle sizes (although the npm module doesn't subtract duplicate bundled code). In the screenshot different react imports are different sizes. Not the most perfect analysis tool, but it just gives you insight about what you're using (for example, I didn't expect useFormik to be 9x bigger than useRef).
Stats
Basic import-cost.nvim repo stats
3
119
3.2
7 months ago
The primary programming language of import-cost.nvim is Lua.