grenache

DHT based high-performance microservices framework, by Bitfinex (by bitfinexcom)

Grenache Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to grenache

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better grenache alternative or higher similarity.

grenache reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of grenache. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-08.
  • Static torrent website with peer-to-peer queries over BitTorrent on 2M records
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Mar 2022
    I'm not talking about the consensus protocol of the blockchain itself, but of the p2p algorithms underlying it, e.g. using Kademlia for service discovery and message routing. I'm asking why a distributed system would choose something like Consul (which uses Raft, and requires a coordinator node) instead of running a decentralized protocol like Kademlia (which has no coordinator nodes) within their distributed single-tenant environment.

    I did a bit more research last night, and discovered that Bitfinex actually does something like this internally (anyone know if this is up to date?) [0] — they built a service discovery mesh by storing arbitrary data on a DHT implementing BEP44 (using webtorrent/bittorrent-dht [1]).

    This seems pretty cool to me, and IMO any modern distributed system should consider running decentralized protocols to benefit from their robustness properties. Deploying a node to a decentralized protocol requires no coordination or orchestration, aside from it simply joining the network. Scaling a service is as simple as joining a node to the network and announcing its availability of an implementation of that service.

    At first glance, this looks like a competitive advantage, because it decouples the operational and maintenance costs of the network from the size of the network.

    So I'm wondering if there is a consistent tradeoff in exchange for this robustness — are decentralized applications more complex to implement but simpler to operate? Is latency of decentralized protocols (e.g. average number of hops to lookup item in a DHT) untenably higher than that of distributed protocols (e.g. one hop once to get instructions from coordinator, then one hop to lookup item in distributed KV)? Does a central coordinator eliminate some kind of principle agent problem, resulting in e.g. a more balanced usage of the hashing keyspace?

    Decentralization emerged because distributed solutions fail in untrusted environments — but this doesn't mean that decentralized solutions fail in trusted environments. So why not consider more decentralized protocols to scale internal systems?

    [0] https://github.com/bitfinexcom/grenache

    [1] https://github.com/webtorrent/bittorrent-dht

Stats

Basic grenache repo stats
1
212
10.0
almost 6 years ago

bitfinexcom/grenache is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.


Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com