Flatpak-dedup-checker Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to flatpak-dedup-checker
-
AppImageLauncher
Helper application for Linux distributions serving as a kind of "entry point" for running and integrating AppImages
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
Overte
Overte is an open-source 3D client and server solution that allows for vast social & educational environments to be created and lived in while also being shared in real-time with others.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
flatpak-dedup-checker reviews and mentions
-
Flatpak Is Not the Future
AppImage is basically a runnable .zip file. It contains a loader and an application with all of its dependencies, packed into a single file. If the image was uncompressed, basic extent-based deduplication could save space, but as far as I know the compressed AppImages just don't match up the files like that.
I don't believe Snap natively offers any deduplication. Snap also uses compression (squashfs as far as I can tell) so deduplicating filesystems are equally powerless.
Flatpak has its own deduplication system (that will confuse df/du if you try to run it and often leads to confusion about download time). Through tools like https://gitlab.com/TheEvilSkeleton/flatpak-dedup-checker/ you can check how effective the dedup process on Flatpak is. On my machine, Flatpak is using 10.5GB of disk space, but reports 13.75GB of files. Running duperemove on /var/lib/flatpak found two identical extents (belonging to cached files) that didn't get deduplicated already.
As for why they couldn't be unpacked: I don't know. They'd take up more disk space, I suppose. Many standard Linux file systems don't have any form of deduplication mechanism built in, so I'm not sure what the balance would be. I would appreciate the ability to decompress AppImages/snaps without writing custom wrappers for them, but if you're on ext4 like many (most?) Linux users, you'll only see the downsides.
- The distribution model is changing
Stats
Popular Comparisons
Sponsored