bf.jq

Brainfuck interpreter written in jq -- This is the proof that jq is turing-complete! (by makenowjust)

Bf.jq Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to bf.jq

  • gron

    64 bf.jq VS gron

    Make JSON greppable!

  • fx

    50 bf.jq VS fx

    Terminal JSON viewer & processor

  • InfluxDB

    Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.

    InfluxDB logo
  • pyxargs

    Command line Python scripting with an xargs-like interface and AWK-like capabilities for data processing and task automation

  • pyp

    5 bf.jq VS pyp

    Easily run Python at the shell! Magical, but never mysterious.

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better bf.jq alternative or higher similarity.

bf.jq reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of bf.jq. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-09-23.
  • Modern Linux Tools vs. Unix Classics: Which Would I Choose?
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Sep 2023
    "Those tried and true commands we were referring to? None other than the usual awk sed cut grep and of course the Unix pipe | to glue them all together. Really, why use a JSON parsing program that only could only do one function (parse JSON) when I could use a combination of tools that, when piped together, could do far more?"

    IMHO, drinking the UNIX Kool-Aid means not only using coreutils and BSD userlands but also using the language in which almost all of those programs are written: C. For me, that means gcc and binutils are amongst the "tried and true commands". Also among them is flex. These are found on all the UNIX varieties I use, usually because they are used in compiling the OS. As such, no special installation is needed.

    When I looked at jq in 2013, I noticed it used flex and possibly yacc/bison. No idea if it still does.

    Using UNIX text processing utilities to manipulate JSON is easy enough. However if I am repeatedly processing JSON from the same source, e.g., YouTube, then I use flex instead of sed, etc. It's faster.

    jq uses flex in the creation of a language interpreter intended^1 to process any JSON. I use flex not to create a language interpeter but to process only JSON from a single source. The blog author uses shell script to process JSON from a single source.^2 I think of the use I make of flex as like a compiled shell script. It's faster.

    The blog author states than jq is specific to one type of text processing input: JSON. I write a utility that is specific to one source of JSON.

    1. Sometimes it's not used as intended, e.g., https://github.com/makenowjust/bf.jq

    2. I also used flex to make simple utility to reformat JSON from any source so it's easer to read and process with line-oriented UNIX utilities. Unlike jq and other JSON reformatters it does not require 100% correct JSON; e.g., it can accept JSON that is mixed in with HTML which I find is quite common in today's web pages.

  • Brainfuck Interpreter Written in Jq
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 2 Jul 2023

Stats

Basic bf.jq repo stats
2
39
10.0
over 9 years ago

The primary programming language of bf.jq is JSONiq.


Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com