Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality. Learn more →
Autodafe Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to autodafe
-
-
spack
A flexible package manager that supports multiple versions, configurations, platforms, and compilers.
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
st
build of the suckless simple terminal with patches for alpha, font2, copyurl, openclipboard, invert, appsync, xresources, scrollback, w3m, keyboard select, boxdraw (by mrdotx)
NOTE:
The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives.
Hence, a higher number means a better autodafe alternative or higher similarity.
autodafe reviews and mentions
Posts with mentions or reviews of autodafe.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-29.
-
Hitting every branch on the way down
Seems like precisely the sort of thing ESR's new de-autotools tool is designed to eliminate. https://gitlab.com/esr/autodafe
- De-Autoconfiscation (Eric Raymond)
- GNU Autoconf is not replaceable in any practical sense
-
Autodafe: "freeing your freeing your project from the clammy grip of autotools."
> entry points
I was curious where this was from, so I looked at https://gitlab.com/esr/autodafe/-/blob/master/de-autoconfisc...
As someone who targets clang/gcc/msvc/icc, I don't see much value in these defines. Let's pick on HAVE_STRDUP: what's the point?
If it's always defined on your target platforms, just use the stdlib unconditionally - the define is pointless.
If it's never defined on your target platforms, you'll have to roll an alternative of your own no matter what - the define is pointless.
So the presumed theoretical use case for this is if you sometimes want to define your own, and sometimes want to use the standard library. But do I actually want that? Rarely. Very rarely. If I care to target old systems, I'd generally rather unconditionally define my own version that doesn't conflict with the standard library, that gets tested and used in all builds on all platforms - it'll be less code than adding a bunch of #ifdef soup, and it'll be less brittle - no "works on my machine but fails on the build server" nonsense because of a typo in sometimes-dead code.
That leaves one even narrower use case which isn't entirely theoretical: wanting to backport a modern codebase to an "ancient" toolchain/stdlib via polyfills without touching the modern codebase or the toolchain/stdlib. That approach has it's niches, but... it is worth emphasizing, niches.
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
www.influxdata.com | 16 May 2024
Stats
Basic autodafe repo stats
5
-
-
-
Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com