acf

Advanced Custom Fields (by AdvancedCustomFields)

Acf Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to acf

  1. ProcessWire

    ProcessWire 3.x is a friendly and powerful open source CMS with a strong API.

  2. Nutrient

    Nutrient - The #1 PDF SDK Library. Bad PDFs = bad UX. Slow load times, broken annotations, clunky UX frustrates users. Nutrient’s PDF SDKs gives seamless document experiences, fast rendering, annotations, real-time collaboration, 100+ features. Used by 10K+ devs, serving ~half a billion users worldwide. Explore the SDK for free.

    Nutrient logo
  3. libgossamer

    Public Key Infrastructure without Certificate Authorities, for WordPress and Packagist

  4. wordpress-fields-api

    Discontinued The 2024 Fields API proposal for WordPress Core

  5. wporg-plugin-guidelines

    WordPress.org Plugin Directory Guidelines

  6. CodeRabbit

    CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.

    CodeRabbit logo
NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better acf alternative or higher similarity.

acf discussion

Log in or Post with

acf reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of acf. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-10-12.
  • ACF Has Been Hijacked
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Oct 2024
    > If they’re willing to do this, I wouldn’t trust any plugins hosted on WordPress.org.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the original author of ACF trusts WordPress more. His last commit was more than 3 years ago and he hasn't shown up on X to defend WP Engine. https://github.com/AdvancedCustomFields/acf/commits?author=e...

  • Secure Custom Fields by WordPress.org
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Oct 2024
    > When I posted, I was under the impression that ACF was open source. But the GitHub repo doesn’t list one, so if it’s not open source…WTF.

    Isn't it here?

    https://github.com/AdvancedCustomFields/acf

    If you mean the licence, it's in readme.txt:

    https://github.com/AdvancedCustomFields/acf/blob/master/read...

  • ACF v6 Beta 1 Preview
    1 project | /r/ProWordPress | 17 Aug 2022
    I rewrote one of my blocks (built last year, registered the block using acf_register_block_type() php function) and it worked in ACF 6 with very minimal adjustments (read the https://github.com/AdvancedCustomFields/acf/issues/654)
  • Evolution of Gutenberg: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly
    1 project | /r/Wordpress | 22 Jan 2022
  • Looking for a competent freelancer/agency to hand leads off to
    1 project | /r/ProWordPress | 26 Mar 2021
    Gutenberg has performance issues when used with ACF since at least a year. For the use case you are describing, flexible content fields along with custom database tables would be way cleaner / robust than Gutenberg. Storing “structured content” as a commented blob in post_content is no better than using shortcodes IMHO.
  • A note from our sponsor - Nutrient
    nutrient.io | 19 Feb 2025
    Bad PDFs = bad UX. Slow load times, broken annotations, clunky UX frustrates users. Nutrient’s PDF SDKs gives seamless document experiences, fast rendering, annotations, real-time collaboration, 100+ features. Used by 10K+ devs, serving ~half a billion users worldwide. Explore the SDK for free. Learn more →

Stats

Basic acf repo stats
5
891
6.6
29 days ago

Sponsored
Nutrient - The #1 PDF SDK Library
Bad PDFs = bad UX. Slow load times, broken annotations, clunky UX frustrates users. Nutrient’s PDF SDKs gives seamless document experiences, fast rendering, annotations, real-time collaboration, 100+ features. Used by 10K+ devs, serving ~half a billion users worldwide. Explore the SDK for free.
nutrient.io

Did you know that PHP is
the 14th most popular programming language
based on number of references?