-
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
These are issues that support claims justify my restrictions to be kept, despite the fact that Griffin has admitted to those claims being false11. It seems strange to hold a player accountable for their past restriction if the person reporting retracts their statement. Support has claimed that external programs (such as Stream Companion5) have the ability to pause the game for you and I would be more than glad to email the programs used. The same issues persist with my current restriction: Why doesn’t Griffin’s outspins get removed while Griffin can report mine and I get restricted when we are doing the same thing?
Something I don't understand is why past bug fixes do not seem to uphold the same ideology. The previous bug fix for spinners is the source of the current bug you're addressing, which is exactly the scenario you mentioned (new loophole). The sliderbug fix took several attempts to fix, and still ended up breaking replays; see osu-stable-issues #554, where in the comments, you said "at the time we decided it wasn't so bad to break replays". And in lazer, spinners already work differently, so maintaining "forward compatibility" shouldn't be much of a concern. To me, it feels a bit silly to worry about "breaking replays" when these replays will be recalculated in lazer anyways. Especially for scoring-related things like spinner/slidertick points, having past replays show slightly more/less points is a non-issue for the majority of players. So I agree with your former opinion, that breaking a few replays to fix a bug doesn't seem like a bad tradeoff, especially when this tradeoff vanishes when migrating to lazer.