Nvim-ers who use any other completion plugin other than nvim-cmp , why?

• kok.nvim

  60 3,368 9.3 Python

  Fast as FUCK nvim completion. SQLite, concurrent scheduler, hundreds of hours of optimization.

I use coq.nvim because of how fast it is

• ddc.vim

  17 647 9.1 TypeScript

  Dark deno-powered completion framework for neovim/Vim

• InfluxDB

  www.influxdata.com featured

  Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.

  

• tl

  54 1,944 7.7 Lua

  The compiler for Teal, a typed dialect of Lua

  

I agree. I've considered writing plugins in something like https://github.com/teal-language/tl for that reason. I strongly prefer statically typed programming languages. I'm a little hesitant to say that any specific choice of programming language is a 'pro' for the end user, especially if it requires another spinning up another runtime. I mean, node or whatever is probably light enough, but it feels antithetical to vim's ethos, to me.

Suggest a related project