-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
I am not sure if my analysis was correct or not, but the description in the video does not match what I saw on etherscan. This contract is a part of a bot advertising video from Cryptain, which now has 22k followers. [Transaction perspective] In 2:45 , we see that 0xa734DAdd145BFE6221C011A61dbB1F2c248851C9 (Cryptain 1)and 0xe1e206e5582D8782528B072d571e35709FF027e7 (Cryptain 2)both belongs to the youtuber. After he created this contract with 0xa73, 0xa73(Cryptain 1) transferred 1 eth to 0x8c5(this contract) as shown in the video. However, another 0.29 eth was sent to 0x8c5(this contract) from 0x69b(unknown) off screen. 0x8c5(this contract) then transferred 1.29 back to 0xa73(Cryptain 1) through 0xe1e( Cryptain 2). At the end of the video, he showed the viewer that he has 1.45 (1.2(original funds) - 1(initial transfer) + 1.29(ending transfer) - gas fees = 1.45) in his account, claiming that he earned 50% + return with the bot within 24 hours, which sounds weird since according to the timestamp on etherscan, the entire money transaction game took about 10 min. [Code perspective] According to the bot script he provided, in line 217, the bot calls a function that will transfer a balance from the bot owner (you) to an address 0xf836D38811AE2cf724CbA59c9e6b118fF6850416 (scammer) The function can be found in a github repo