-
chakra-ui
⚡️Simple, Modular & Accessible UI Components for your React Applications (by segunadebayo)
@jxom went on to create bumbag and in that repo recommends Chakra as an alternative for these unmaintained libraries.
See top of readme: https://github.com/jxom/bumbag-ui
So not sure what controversy you're trying to stir. Fannypack didn't have dark mode, Accordions, Alerts, Breadcrumbs, responsive containers, and a whole slew of components that Chakra had.
In fact if you look at the Avatar component from Chakra 5 yrs ago vs the Fannypack Avatar you'll see the code is completely different.
https://github.com/segunadebayo/chakra-ui/blob/master/src/Av...
https://github.com/jxom/fannypack/blob/c7046c5f58cc68ee756be...
The most likely story is he was just using Fannypack's docs as a reference for how to format his own.
-
Sevalla
Deploy and host your apps and databases, now with $50 credit! Sevalla is the PaaS you have been looking for! Advanced deployment pipelines, usage-based pricing, preview apps, templates, human support by developers, and much more!
-
@jxom went on to create bumbag and in that repo recommends Chakra as an alternative for these unmaintained libraries.
See top of readme: https://github.com/jxom/bumbag-ui
So not sure what controversy you're trying to stir. Fannypack didn't have dark mode, Accordions, Alerts, Breadcrumbs, responsive containers, and a whole slew of components that Chakra had.
In fact if you look at the Avatar component from Chakra 5 yrs ago vs the Fannypack Avatar you'll see the code is completely different.
https://github.com/segunadebayo/chakra-ui/blob/master/src/Av...
https://github.com/jxom/fannypack/blob/c7046c5f58cc68ee756be...
The most likely story is he was just using Fannypack's docs as a reference for how to format his own.
-
-
This looks a lot better than I expected.
One thing that bugs me about this (and Tailwind) is the number of dependencies they pull in. Panda has 152 nodes (239, if you count their dev-dependencies)[0].
Tailwind has 98 (594 if you count their dev-dependencies).
I know they're only dev-dependencies, but still... I've got all of that code running on my machine, just to process CSS. I really don't love it.
[0] https://npmgraph.js.org/?q=%40pandacss%2Fdev
-
Works in both React and Preact. It's designed to support generating styles at build time, but I've never bothered. For the sorts of things I work on, being able to quickly bang out a component is more important than golfing the bundle size or maintaining a design system.
jsxstyle feels like I can sculpt in code. It's really satisfying to hammer out some props and see a component come to life, especially when you've got hot module replacement working.
Based on a quick perusal of linked page, Panda seems like perhaps a more mature version of jsxstyle, but also more fidgety. As an army of one, I'm happy to optimize for iteration speed, but if I needed to maintain a system, maybe I'd consider switching to Panda.
https://www.npmjs.com/package/jsxstyle
-
@jxom went on to create bumbag and in that repo recommends Chakra as an alternative for these unmaintained libraries.
See top of readme: https://github.com/jxom/bumbag-ui
So not sure what controversy you're trying to stir. Fannypack didn't have dark mode, Accordions, Alerts, Breadcrumbs, responsive containers, and a whole slew of components that Chakra had.
In fact if you look at the Avatar component from Chakra 5 yrs ago vs the Fannypack Avatar you'll see the code is completely different.
https://github.com/segunadebayo/chakra-ui/blob/master/src/Av...
https://github.com/jxom/fannypack/blob/c7046c5f58cc68ee756be...
The most likely story is he was just using Fannypack's docs as a reference for how to format his own.
