Technically, are there any difference between tokens that are used as currencies like (LINK, DIA, SUSHI, GRT..)?

• contracts

  4 318 8.8 TypeScript

  Contracts repository for The Graph protocol (by graphprotocol)

  

GraphToken.sol Based on OpenZeppelin's ERC20 implementation. Burnable, which means that users can reduce supply by burning their tokens, based on OpenZeppelin's ERC20Burnable. "The token is initially owned by the deployer address that can mint tokens to create the initial distribution. For convenience, an initial supply can be passed in the constructor that will be assigned to the deployer." Minting has their own, custom implementation, suited specifically to this project. Supports EIP712 and EIP2612.

• diadata

  7 231 9.5 Go

  DIAdata.org platform

  

DIAToken.sol Based on OpenZeppelin's ERC20 implementation. Mintable and ownable, which means that there's an admin account which can issue new tokens. No other customization beyond that.

• WorkOS

  workos.com sponsored

  The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.

  

• LinkToken

  1 131 0.0 Solidity

  LINK Token Contracts for the Chainlink Network

  

LinkToken.sol v0.6 Based on OpenZeppelin's ERC20 implementation with slight customizations to allow increasing and decreasing the allowance atomically. The only other customization is an extra safeguard against sending tokens to the contract address by mistake.

• sushiswap

  10 1,890 10.0 TypeScript

  Sushi 2.0 🍣

  

SushiToken.sol Based on OpenZeppelin's ERC20 implementation. Mintable and ownable, which means that there's an admin account which can issue new tokens. Has custom built-in voting functionality.

Suggest a related project