zod
Superstruct
zod | Superstruct | |
---|---|---|
290 | 26 | |
30,477 | 6,815 | |
- | - | |
9.1 | 5.5 | |
5 days ago | 4 days ago | |
TypeScript | TypeScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
zod
-
Simplifying Form Validation with Zod and React Hook Form
[Zod Documentation](https://zod.dev/) [Zod Error Handling](https://zod.dev/ERROR_HANDLING?id=error-handling-in-zod) [React-Hook-Form Documentation](https://react-hook-form.com/get-started) [Hookform Resolvers](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@hookform/resolvers)
-
Figma's Journey to TypeScript
This is a very fair comment, and you seem open to understanding why types are useful.
"problems that are due to typing" is a very difficult thing to unpack because types can mean _so_ many things.
Static types are absolutely useless (and, really, a net negative) if you're not using them well.
Types don't help if you don't spend the time modeling with the type system. You can use the type system to your advantage to prevent invalid states from being represented _at all_.
As an example, consider a music player that keeps track of the current song and the current position in the song.
If you model this naively you might do something like: https://gist.github.com/shepherdjerred/d0f57c99bfd69cf9eada4...
In the example above you _are_ using types. It might not be obvious that some of these issues can be solved with stronger types, that is, you might say that "You rarely see problems that are due to typing".
Here's an example where the type system can give you a lot more safety: https://gist.github.com/shepherdjerred/0976bc9d86f0a19a75757...
You'll notice that this kind of safety is pretty limited. If you're going to write a music app, you'll probably need API calls, local storage, URL routes, etc.
TypeScript's typechecking ends at the "boundaries" of the type system, e.g. it cannot automatically typecheck your fetch or localStorage calls return the correct types. If you're casting, you're bypassing the type systems and making it worthless. Runtime type checking libraries like Zod [0] can take care of this for you and are able to typecheck at the boundaries of your app so that the type system can work _extremely_ well.
[0]: https://zod.dev/ note: I mentioned Zod because I like it. There are _many_ similar libraries.
-
From Flaky to Flawless: Angular API Response Management with Zod
Zod is an open-source schema declaration and validation library that emphasizes TypeScript. It can refer to any data type, from simple to complex. Zod eliminates duplicative type declarations by inferring static TypeScript types and allows easy composition of complex data structures from simpler ones. It has no dependencies, is compatible with Node.js and modern browsers, and has a concise, chainable interface. Zod is lightweight (8kb when zipped), immutable, with methods returning new instances. It encourages parsing over validation and is not limited to TypeScript but works well with JavaScript as well.
- TypeScript Essentials: Distinguishing Types with Branding
-
You can’t run away from runtime errors using TypeScript
Zod is a TypeScript-first schema declaration and validation library. It helps create schemas for any data type and is very developer-friendly. Zod has the functional approach of "parse, don't validate." It supports coercion in all primitive types.
-
Best Next.js Libraries and Tools in 2024
Link: https://zod.dev/
-
Popular Libraries For Building Type-safe Web Application APIs
You can check out their documentation here.
-
Epic Next JS 14 Tutorial Part 4: How To Handle Login And Authentication in Next.js
You can learn more about Zod on their website here.
-
What even is a JSON number?
In JS, it's a good idea anyway to use some JSON parsing library instead of JSON.parse.
With Zod, you can use z.bigint() parser. If you take the "parse any JSON" snippet https://zod.dev/?id=json-type and change z.number() to z.bigint(), it should do what you are looking for.
-
Error handling in our form component for the NextAuth CredentialsProvider
We will validate our input using client-side zod. Zod handles TypeScript-first schema validation with static type inference. This means that it will not only validate your fields, it will also set types on validated fields.
Superstruct
-
Popular Libraries For Building Type-safe Web Application APIs
You can check out Superstruct documentation here.
-
Lessons from open-source: Replace zod with superstruct if you do not use zod’s advanced capabilities
This is where I saw compiled folder has superstruct’s minified code.
-
Mastering Type-Safe JSON Serialization in TypeScript
However, working with the unknown type is less convenient than merely specifying the desired data type. Apart from type-casting, there are multiple ways to convert the unknown type into the required data type. One such method is utilizing the Superstruct library to validate data at runtime and throw detailed errors if the data is invalid.
- Where DRY Applies
-
Unleashing the Power of TypeScript: Improving Standard Library Types
For example, the superstruct library is a lighter alternative to Zod. This library is more suitable for use on the client side since it has a relatively small size (13.1 kB vs 3.4 kB).
-
Banditypes: The mighty 400-byte schema validator for TS / JS
Banditstash, like all the newer validation libraries (yup, zod, superstruct, typed) can auto-generate TS type from a JS schema:
-
Typescript Runtime Validators and DX, a type-checking performance analysis of zod/superstruct/yup/typebox
Superstruct 1.0.3
-
React Router Actions Form Submission and Validation
Inside the action, the first thing we're going to do is get the formData using the request object. Then we will create an object from the formData data that will later be validated by our superstruct schema.
-
Is there any reason not to use typescript?
You could use Zod or Superstruct to validate the types of values, or use typestack/class-validator if it makes sense.
- Why doesn’t TypeScript natively do any type checking
What are some alternatives?
class-validator - Decorator-based property validation for classes.
Yup - Dead simple Object schema validation
joi - The most powerful data validation library for JS [Moved to: https://github.com/sideway/joi]
joi - The most powerful data validation library for JS [Moved to: https://github.com/hapijs/joi]
typebox - Json Schema Type Builder with Static Type Resolution for TypeScript
ajv - The fastest JSON schema Validator. Supports JSON Schema draft-04/06/07/2019-09/2020-12 and JSON Type Definition (RFC8927)
MikroORM - TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns. Supports MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, MS SQL Server, PostgreSQL and SQLite/libSQL databases.
openapi-cop - A proxy that validates responses and requests against an OpenAPI document. https://www.npmjs.com/package/openapi-cop https://hub.docker.com/r/lxlu/openapi-cop
io-ts - Runtime type system for IO decoding/encoding
schema-inspector - Schema-Inspector is a simple JavaScript object sanitization and validation module.